[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-18018?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17632364#comment-17632364
]
Shailaja Koppu commented on CASSANDRA-18018:
--------------------------------------------
[~samt] reg
_I think that the confusion here mainly stems from the fact that superusers (in
C* as in pgsql) implicitly acquire ALL PERMISSIONS, because authz checks are
bypassed for them, whereas LIST PERMISSIONS and the system table which backs it
in the default implementation is concerned with explicitly granted permissions._
Agree, makes sense to store explicitly granted permissions. The problem is
currently list permissions command showing only explicitly granted permissions
after a grant command, I think list command can be improved to print all (both
implicitly and explicitly acquired) permissions that the role has. A typical
user expects LIST PERMISSIONS to list all permissions that the role has,
regardless of how they were acquired.
> List command output not correct for super user, after grant command
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CASSANDRA-18018
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-18018
> Project: Cassandra
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Feature/Authorization
> Reporter: Shailaja Koppu
> Priority: Normal
> Labels: lhf
>
> Running local Cassandra with below config:
> {noformat}
> authenticator: PasswordAuthenticator
> authorizer: CassandraAuthorizer
> role_manager: CassandraRoleManager
> network_authorizer: CassandraNetworkAuthorizer{noformat}
> Created a super user and then ran *Grant select* command on a keyspace.
> {noformat}
> shaadmin1@cqlsh> CREATE USER 'shaadmin1c1' WITH PASSWORD 'shaadmin1c1'
> SUPERUSER;
> shaadmin1@cqlsh:system_auth> grant select on testk1.t1 to shaadmin1c1;
> shaadmin1@cqlsh:system_auth> alter role shaadmin1c1 with access to all
> datacenters;
> {noformat}
>
> After this, list permissions command showing only select permission for that
> role on the resource.
> {noformat}
> shaadmin1c1@cqlsh> list all permissions of shaadmin1c1;
> role | username | resource | permission
> ----------------------------------------+-----------
> shaadmin1c1 | shaadmin1c1 | <table testk1.t1> | SELECT
> {noformat}
>
> Row in role_permissions table:
> {noformat}
> role | resource | permissions
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> shaadmin1c1 | data/testk1/t1 | {'SELECT'}{noformat}
> But insert command by that role on the resource is successful because role is
> a super user
> {noformat}
> shaadmin1c1@cqlsh> insert into testk1.t1 (c1, c2) values ('a', 1);
> shaadmin1c1@cqlsh> select * from testk1.t1 ;
> c1 | c2
> ---+---
> a | 1
> (1 rows)
> {noformat}
>
> The problem is, output of list permissions command, which indicates only
> select permission on the resource, is misleading. I think list command need
> to be fixed to show all permissions super user has on the resource. Also
> grant command for a super user can be either a no-op or throw error, because
> the role already have requested permissions.
>
> Documentation also misleading:
> {quote}True automatically grants AUTHORIZE, CREATE and DROP permission on ALL
> ROLES.
> Superusers can only manage roles by default. To manage other resources,
> {color:#ff0000}you must grant the permission set to that resource. **
> {color}For example, to allow access management for all keyspaces: {{{}GRANT
> ALL PERMISSIONS ON ALL KEYSPACES TO }}\{{{}{*}role_name{*}{}}}.
> {quote}
>
>
>
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
