[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-18091?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Ke Han updated CASSANDRA-18091:
-------------------------------
    Bug Category: Parent values: Correctness(12982)Level 1 values: Transient 
Incorrect Response(12987)

> Column update lost after a full stop upgrade from 4.0.6 to trunk (4.2:fdc88a)
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CASSANDRA-18091
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-18091
>             Project: Cassandra
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Ke Han
>            Priority: Normal
>
> When we performed a full-stop upgrade from release 4.0.6 to 4.2 trunk 
> (fdc88a), we executed the same read command before and after the upgrade and 
> found that some column updates were lost after the upgrade.
> This inconsistency is likely related to timing. We cannot reproduce this case 
> {*}deterministically{*}. But if we keep executing the same following command 
> sequence, this bug can be triggered every ten times.
> Steps to reproduce:
> 1. Set up a 4.0.6 3-node cluster. (N0: seed node, N1, N2). Default 
> configurations, set num_tokens to 256.
> 2. Execute the following cqlsh command
>  
> {code:java}
> CREATE KEYSPACE  uuid5f86250110a247d48c481c5579cb2ea1 WITH REPLICATION = { 
> 'class' : 'SimpleStrategy', 'replication_factor' : 1 };
> CREATE TABLE  uuid5f86250110a247d48c481c5579cb2ea1.kattmG (kattmG TEXT,VldG 
> TEXT,Ajqm TEXT,lTQSQ INT,EVzlSKrbkUGyhJshH TEXT, PRIMARY KEY (lTQSQ ));
> CREATE KEYSPACE IF NOT EXISTS uuidc5b00efccc77471888e6e8e233998779 WITH 
> REPLICATION = { 'class' : 'SimpleStrategy', 'replication_factor' : 2 };
> DELETE FROM uuid5f86250110a247d48c481c5579cb2ea1.kattmG WHERE lTQSQ = 2;
> ALTER TABLE uuid5f86250110a247d48c481c5579cb2ea1.kattmG DROP kattmG ;
> INSERT INTO uuid5f86250110a247d48c481c5579cb2ea1.kattmG (Ajqm, 
> EVzlSKrbkUGyhJshH, lTQSQ) VALUES 
> ('nZJzNjYnXOwPLpVoFSVwxcvznsDFBYqmlprrVXYJQLzYvYkrmfEsiuAcCtggypnxIkIevRHyPQGOWrIZNObJ','RaAhbVKUQzgJaupaupKPVnNLLYDaZEaMyFteVwhLePqZwikuBEsVDxTuTqBfkFYmeMMsOFXjVkObZduPfAFsLzuYlrgpYsPPxDNQCRzzPaEdWHARnnWbAFAUUnbYnvEESeHDRHSkEhSnoREprrHWasYLMSocIYiMGQXjzsaKptqbtPgrztIdpQLgDAZOPfhJIblmwTFAWiFbzrbTkFwJGP',1693380861);
> DELETE FROM uuid5f86250110a247d48c481c5579cb2ea1.kattmG WHERE lTQSQ = 
> 1693380861;
> INSERT INTO uuid5f86250110a247d48c481c5579cb2ea1.kattmG (lTQSQ) VALUES (2);
> ALTER TABLE uuid5f86250110a247d48c481c5579cb2ea1.kattmG DROP VldG ;
> INSERT INTO uuid5f86250110a247d48c481c5579cb2ea1.kattmG (lTQSQ) VALUES 
> (1693380861);
> INSERT INTO uuid5f86250110a247d48c481c5579cb2ea1.kattmG (Ajqm, lTQSQ) VALUES 
> ('ldrsHa',1693380861);
> ALTER TABLE uuid5f86250110a247d48c481c5579cb2ea1.kattmG DROP Ajqm ; {code}
> 3. Execute a `SELECT` command at N0, get result
>  
> {code:java}
> SELECT lTQSQ FROM uuid5f86250110a247d48c481c5579cb2ea1.kattmG;
>  ltqsq
> ------------
>  1693380861
>           2
> (2 rows){code}
>  
>  
> 4. Perform a full-stop upgrade. (Set num_tokens to 256)
>    1. Drain N0, stop N0.
>    2. Drain N1, stop N1.
>    3. Drain N2, stop N2.
>    4. Start up N0.
>    5. Start up N1.
>    6. Start up N2.
> 5. Execute the same `SELECT` command at N0, get result
>  
> {code:java}
> SELECT lTQSQ FROM uuid5f86250110a247d48c481c5579cb2ea1.kattmG;
>  ltqsq
> -------
>      2
> (1 rows){code}
> Or
>  
>  
> {code:java}
> SELECT lTQSQ FROM uuid5f86250110a247d48c481c5579cb2ea1.kattmG;
>  ltqsq
> -------
> (0 rows){code}
>  
> The new result is inconsistent with the old version.
>  
> Is this an expected behaviour during the full-stop upgrade?
>  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to