[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-18239?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17685896#comment-17685896
]
Michael Semb Wever commented on CASSANDRA-18239:
------------------------------------------------
I don't have much of an opinion, except the more we can automate code style the
more we remove nit comments from PRs coming from new contributor.
If you can bring up the numbers for suppressions and valid patterns, then it'll
be easy to make a quantified response.
> Remove eclipse warnings task
> ----------------------------
>
> Key: CASSANDRA-18239
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-18239
> Project: Cassandra
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: Build
> Reporter: Jacek Lewandowski
> Priority: Normal
>
> Eclipse warnings is used for static code analysis. However, it does not fit
> well into Cassandra code and practically we end up explicitly adding
> suppressions in many places just to satisfy that tool rather than fix the
> real issues.
> This is an incomplete list of reasons to remove it:
> - not closed resources are detected incorrectly
> - does not recognize custom utility methods used to close the resources,
> which use use heavily in the code, like {{Throwables.close}},
> {{FileUtils.close}}, {{closeQuietly}}...
> - because of the above, we cannot make important things like {{Ref}} to
> implement {{Closeable}} as it would make the tool to explode with tons of
> warnings
> - it complains about correct generics - something like "method X is not
> applicable for ..." when the code compiles successfully is not acceptable
> - it is old and not maintained
> There are better tools like IntelliJ inspections for example, which can also
> be run in headless mode
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
