[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-18134?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17690433#comment-17690433
 ] 

Jacek Lewandowski commented on CASSANDRA-18134:
-----------------------------------------------

Let me ask question as simple as possible:
1. Branimir reviewed that, I got +1 from him
2. Applied the changes to make this NC, so all 4.x will be able to read it 
regardless whether it lands in 4.x or trunk
3. I want to merge it to trunk - if we decide to use OA, we can make that 
decision right before releasing trunk
4. Can I merge given CI is OK?


> Improve handling of min/max clustering in sstable
> -------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CASSANDRA-18134
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-18134
>             Project: Cassandra
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Local/SSTable
>            Reporter: Jacek Lewandowski
>            Assignee: Jacek Lewandowski
>            Priority: Normal
>             Fix For: 5.x
>
>
> This patch improves the following things:
> # SSTable metadata will store a covered slice in addition min/max 
> clusterings. The difference is that for slices there is available the type of 
> a bound rather than just a clustering. In particular it will provide the 
> information whether the lower and upper bound of an sstable is opened or 
> closed. The legacy min/max clustering will be stored until a new major format 
> {{o}} to ensure backward compatibility
> # SSTable metadata will store a flag whether the SSTable contains any 
> partition level deletions or not
> # SSTable metadata will store the first and the last keys of the sstable. 
> This is mostly for consistency - key range is logically a part of stats 
> metadata. So far it is stored at the end of the index summary. After this 
> change, index summary will be no longer needed to read key range of an 
> sstable (although we will keep storing key range as before for compatibility 
> reasons)
> # The above two changes required to introduce a new minor format for SSTables 
> - {{nc}}
> # Single partition read command makes use of the above changes. In particular 
> an sstable can be skipped when it does not intersect with the column filter, 
> does not have partition level deletions and does not have statics; In case 
> there are partition level deletions, but the other conditions are satisfied, 
> only the partition header needs to be accessed (tests attached)
> # Skipping sstables assuming those three conditions are satisfied has been 
> implemented also for partition range queries (tests attached). Also added 
> minor separate statistics to record the number of accessed sstables in 
> partition reads because now not all of them need to be accessed. That 
> statistics is also needed in tests to confirm skipping.
> # Artificial lower bound marker is now an object on its own and is not 
> implemented as a special case of range tombstone bound. Instead it sorts 
> right before the lowest available bound in the data
> # Extended the lower bound optimization usage due the 1 and 2
> # Do not initialize iterator just to get a cached partition and associated 
> columns index. The purpose of using lower bound optimization was to avoid 
> opening an iterator of an sstable if possible.
> See also CASSANDRA-14861
> The changes in this patch include work of [~blambov], [~slebresne], 
> [~jakubzytka] and [~jlewandowski]



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@cassandra.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commits-h...@cassandra.apache.org

Reply via email to