[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-18398?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17717321#comment-17717321
]
David Capwell commented on CASSANDRA-18398:
-------------------------------------------
bq. which replication should properly deal with
Assuming quorum, this may not be true? Even with read repair?
{code}
T0: write(pk=0, value=42) -> replicas[R1, R2, R3]
T1: R1 wrote
T2: R2 wrote
T3: R3 dropped message
T4: R2 disk corrupted and impacted index for pk=0
T5: read(pk=0) -> coordinator selects this ordering [R2, R3]
T6: R2 searches for pk=0 and returns no partition (could not find)
T7: R3 returns no partition
T8: user sees quorum violated
{code}
> CEP-25: Trie-indexed SSTable format
> -----------------------------------
>
> Key: CASSANDRA-18398
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-18398
> Project: Cassandra
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Local/SSTable
> Reporter: Branimir Lambov
> Assignee: Branimir Lambov
> Priority: Normal
> Fix For: 5.x
>
> Time Spent: 17h 10m
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> Implementation of Big Trie-Indexed (BTI) SSTable format, per
> [CEP-25|https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CASSANDRA/CEP-25%3A+Trie-indexed+SSTable+format].
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
