[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-18352?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17720895#comment-17720895
]
Andres de la Peña commented on CASSANDRA-18352:
-----------------------------------------------
[~jwest] thanks, it looks great to me. The only thing left is [this
nit|https://github.com/apache/cassandra/pull/2246#discussion_r1166683282] about
adding the reason for the guardrail. Other than that, I'm +1 on the changes.
> Add Option to Timebox write timestamps
> --------------------------------------
>
> Key: CASSANDRA-18352
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-18352
> Project: Cassandra
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: CQL/Semantics
> Reporter: Jordan West
> Assignee: Jordan West
> Priority: Normal
> Time Spent: 2.5h
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> In several cases it is desirable to have client provided timestamps generated
> at the application-level. This can be error prone, however. In particular,
> applications can choose timestamps that may be nonsensical for a given
> application. One dangerous manifestation of this is the "doomstone" (a
> tombstone far in the future of any realistic write). This feature would allow
> either operators or users to specify a minimum and maximum timebound of
> "reasonable" timestamps. The default would be negative infinity, positive
> infinity to maintain backwards compatibility. Writes that are USING TIMESTAMP
> with a timestamp outside of the timebox will see an exception.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
