[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-2890?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13103624#comment-13103624
]
Jonathan Ellis commented on CASSANDRA-2890:
-------------------------------------------
Sounds reasonable.
Should we move threadlocal<random> to FBUtilities since we have one in
CounterMutation as well?
> Randomize (to some extend) the choice of the first replica for counter
> increment
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CASSANDRA-2890
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-2890
> Project: Cassandra
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Core
> Affects Versions: 0.8.0
> Reporter: Sylvain Lebresne
> Assignee: Sylvain Lebresne
> Priority: Minor
> Labels: counters
> Fix For: 0.8.6
>
> Attachments: 2890.patch
>
>
> Right now, we choose the first replica for a counter increments based solely
> on what the snitch returns. If the clients requests are well balanced over
> the cluster and the snitch not ill configured, this should not be a problem,
> but this is probably too strong an assumption to make.
> The goal of this ticket is to change this to choose a random replica in the
> current data center instead.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
