[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-19207?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17801911#comment-17801911
]
Brandon Williams commented on CASSANDRA-19207:
----------------------------------------------
[~zony] I'm unable to find any place we are including java-cup-runtime, can you
show me?
> Inquiry and Clarification on Addition of java-cup-runtime-11b-20160615.jar in
> Cassandra 4.0.10 Upgrade
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CASSANDRA-19207
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-19207
> Project: Cassandra
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Zongyue Li
> Priority: Normal
> Attachments: image-2023-12-19-11-36-26-925.png,
> image-2023-12-19-11-36-49-151.png, image-2023-12-19-11-37-32-251.png,
> image-2023-12-19-11-43-19-071.png, image-2023-12-19-11-43-36-536.png,
> image-2023-12-19-11-45-06-345.png, image-2023-12-19-11-45-18-681.png,
> image-2023-12-19-11-45-30-576.png, image-2023-12-19-13-44-16-660.png
>
>
> During the recent upgrade from Cassandra 3 to Cassandra 4.0.10, I noticed the
> introduction of a GPL-Compatible dependency, specifically
> "java-cup-runtime-11b-20160615.jar." Upon further investigation, the
> declaration of this dependency seems to add an extra layer of complexity.
> While I understand that introducing GPL-Compatible dependencies into Apache
> is generally acceptable, the necessity of this declaration and whether it is
> an additional step has raised concerns.
> !image-2023-12-19-13-44-16-660.png|width=841,height=196!
> !image-2023-12-19-11-43-19-071.png|width=611,height=373!
> [This LINCENSE|https://www2.cs.tum.edu/projects/cup/licence.php] refer to
> "Historical Permission Notice and Disclaimer"
> !image-2023-12-19-11-45-06-345.png|width=556,height=430!
> This uncommon license falls under Category A.
> !image-2023-12-19-11-45-18-681.png|width=490,height=478!
> Additionally, I observed that some portions of the code are explicitly marked
> as GPL (①). However, in the README file on the project's homepage, there is a
> clear indication of the licenses for different distribution packages. I
> believe we should reference Protocol ② or ③, namely the Historical protocol.
> !image-2023-12-19-11-45-30-576.png|width=523,height=308!
> I would like to bring attention to these two issues to ensure that we adhere
> to the correct protocols when using and distributing the code. Please
> consider explicitly stating in the relevant documentation or instructions
> that we are using the Historical protocol.
> Thank you for your attention to these issues. I believe addressing them will
> contribute to ensuring the legality of our code usage and distribution.
>
>
>
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
