[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-18766?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17873600#comment-17873600
 ] 

Brandon Williams commented on CASSANDRA-18766:
----------------------------------------------

This bug was introduced in CASSANDRA-15241 which explains why it started in 
4.1.3.  However, CASSANDRA-19534 happened to fix it, so no code changes are 
needed, just a release.  /cc [~maedhroz] since you were involved in both of 
those!

I've pared down the 
[dtest|https://github.com/driftx/cassandra-dtest/tree/CASSANDRA-18766] to not 
run so long but still reproduce (under 2m), and confirmed it still bisects 
correctly, so I think it's suitable to commit now.  

I'll work on getting 4.1.6 released for this.

> high speculative retries on v4.1.3
> ----------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CASSANDRA-18766
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-18766
>             Project: Cassandra
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Consistency/Coordination
>            Reporter: Ivans Novikovs
>            Assignee: Brandon Williams
>            Priority: Urgent
>             Fix For: 4.1.x
>
>         Attachments: screenshot-1.png, screenshot-2.png, signature.asc, 
> signature.asc, v4.0.png, v4.1.png
>
>
> There are up to 10+ times higher speculative retries for reads on 4.1.3 
> comparing to 4.0.7 and 4.1.2 when using QUORUM and default setting of 99p.
> On 4.1.3 after upgrade I see speculative retries for up to 35% of all reads 
> for specific table. Latency for reads is stable around 500 microseconds.
> java 1.8.0_382 is used



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to