[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-1034?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Pavel Yaskevich updated CASSANDRA-1034:
---------------------------------------
Attachment: CASSANDRA-1034.patch
Patch removes DK and IPartitioner.decorateKey(ByteBuffer key), which is
replaced by IPartitioner.getToken(ByteBuffer key), Token now takes second
parameter - ByteBuffer key. Most of the patch are replacements for DK -> Token
and decorateKey -> getToken. All tests (test, test-compression, long-test) pass.
Rebased with the latest trunk (last commit
7624536ae7fea52bcf761c7dea212fe12d2f4586)
> Remove assumption that Key to Token is one-to-one
> -------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CASSANDRA-1034
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-1034
> Project: Cassandra
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Stu Hood
> Assignee: Sylvain Lebresne
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 1.1
>
> Attachments:
> 0001-Make-range-accept-both-Token-and-DecoratedKey.patch,
> 0002-LengthPartitioner.patch, 1034-1-Generify-AbstractBounds-v3.patch,
> 1034-2-Remove-assumption-that-token-and-keys-are-one-to-one-v3.patch,
> 1034_v1.txt, CASSANDRA-1034.patch
>
>
> get_range_slices assumes that Tokens do not collide and converts a KeyRange
> to an AbstractBounds. For RandomPartitioner, this assumption isn't safe, and
> would lead to a very weird heisenberg.
> Converting AbstractBounds to use a DecoratedKey would solve this, because the
> byte[] key portion of the DecoratedKey can act as a tiebreaker.
> Alternatively, we could make DecoratedKey extend Token, and then use
> DecoratedKeys in places where collisions are unacceptable.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
