[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-9754?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Josh McKenzie updated CASSANDRA-9754:
-------------------------------------
Status: Triage Needed (was: Awaiting Feedback)
> Make index info heap friendly for large CQL partitions
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CASSANDRA-9754
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-9754
> Project: Apache Cassandra
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Legacy/Core
> Reporter: Sankalp Kohli
> Assignee: Michael Kjellman
> Priority: Low
> Fix For: 5.x
>
> Attachments: 0f8e28c220fd5af6c7b5dd2d3dab6936c4aa4b6b.patch,
> gc_collection_times_with_birch.png, gc_collection_times_without_birch.png,
> gc_counts_with_birch.png, gc_counts_without_birch.png,
> perf_cluster_1_with_birch_read_latency_and_counts.png,
> perf_cluster_1_with_birch_write_latency_and_counts.png,
> perf_cluster_2_with_birch_read_latency_and_counts.png,
> perf_cluster_2_with_birch_write_latency_and_counts.png,
> perf_cluster_3_without_birch_read_latency_and_counts.png,
> perf_cluster_3_without_birch_write_latency_and_counts.png
>
>
> Looking at a heap dump of 2.0 cluster, I found that majority of the objects
> are IndexInfo and its ByteBuffers. This is specially bad in endpoints with
> large CQL partitions. If a CQL partition is say 6,4GB, it will have 100K
> IndexInfo objects and 200K ByteBuffers. This will create a lot of churn for
> GC. Can this be improved by not creating so many objects?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
