[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-20404?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Maulin Vasavada updated CASSANDRA-20404:
----------------------------------------
Description:
Currently,
[EncryptionOptions.java|https://github.com/apache/cassandra/blob/trunk/src/java/org/apache/cassandra/config/EncryptionOptions.java#L520]
allows constructing the object using `with` prefix method pattern which sounds
similar to the Builder Pattern
([example)|https://blogs.oracle.com/javamagazine/post/exploring-joshua-blochs-builder-design-pattern-in-java]
However, when there is any new parameter introduced in the class for a
corresponding configuration option, it requires changes to all the constructor
calls from those `with` methods to reflect the new parameter. This is error
prone given so many string parameters and considering some [special
use-cases|https://github.com/apache/cassandra/blob/trunk/src/java/org/apache/cassandra/config/EncryptionOptions.java#L1190]
it makes it challenging to modify the code for a simple task - adding a new
parameter in the class.
Proposal here is to use the Builder pattern (like shows in the example linked
above) to improve the code in EncryptionOptions.java file.
There could be a potential to consider using "java record" type that got
introduced in Java 14+ but in order to be backward compatible may be we can
simply follow the builder pattern.
was:
Currently,
[EncryptionOptions.java|https://github.com/apache/cassandra/blob/trunk/src/java/org/apache/cassandra/config/EncryptionOptions.java#L520]
allows constructing the object using `with` prefix method pattern which sounds
similar to the Builder Pattern
([example)|https://blogs.oracle.com/javamagazine/post/exploring-joshua-blochs-builder-design-pattern-in-java]
However, when there is any new parameter introduced in the class for a
corresponding configuration option, it requires changes to all the constructor
calls from those `with` methods to reflect the new parameter. This is error
prone given so many string parameters and considering some [special
use-cases|https://github.com/apache/cassandra/blob/trunk/src/java/org/apache/cassandra/config/EncryptionOptions.java#L1190]
it makes it challenging to modify the code for a simple task - adding a new
parameter in the class.
Proposal here is to use the Builder pattern (like shows in the example linked
above) to improve the code in EncryptionOptions.java file.
There could be a potential to consider using "java record" type that got
introduced in Java 14+ but in order to be backward compatible may be we can
simply follow the builder pattern.
> Improve EncryptionOptions class's `with` methods using Builder pattern
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CASSANDRA-20404
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-20404
> Project: Apache Cassandra
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Maulin Vasavada
> Priority: Normal
>
> Currently,
> [EncryptionOptions.java|https://github.com/apache/cassandra/blob/trunk/src/java/org/apache/cassandra/config/EncryptionOptions.java#L520]
> allows constructing the object using `with` prefix method pattern which
> sounds similar to the Builder Pattern
> ([example)|https://blogs.oracle.com/javamagazine/post/exploring-joshua-blochs-builder-design-pattern-in-java]
> However, when there is any new parameter introduced in the class for a
> corresponding configuration option, it requires changes to all the
> constructor calls from those `with` methods to reflect the new parameter.
> This is error prone given so many string parameters and considering some
> [special
> use-cases|https://github.com/apache/cassandra/blob/trunk/src/java/org/apache/cassandra/config/EncryptionOptions.java#L1190]
> it makes it challenging to modify the code for a simple task - adding a new
> parameter in the class.
> Proposal here is to use the Builder pattern (like shows in the example linked
> above) to improve the code in EncryptionOptions.java file.
> There could be a potential to consider using "java record" type that got
> introduced in Java 14+ but in order to be backward compatible may be we can
> simply follow the builder pattern.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
