[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-21165?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=18057666#comment-18057666
 ] 

Harsh Desai commented on CASSANDRA-21165:
-----------------------------------------

Thanks for the quick response.The logging might need to be fixed in that case, 
as it is not a true reflection of the query.

The question still remains open though that why it tries to fetch all 
columns/large message.

Added replica node logs in the Jira description.

> Query read timeout potentially due to altered query on server side
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CASSANDRA-21165
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-21165
>             Project: Apache Cassandra
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Harsh Desai
>            Priority: Urgent
>         Attachments: CQL_TRACING_Output.txt
>
>
> During load testing of Cassandra 5.0.6 cluster, we came across an unusual 
> issue wherein a lightweight CQL query times out.
> Upon further analysis, it was found that the query being executed on the 
> server side does not seem to be the same as the one sent by driver.
>  
> {+}Client side code{+}:
> this.statement = session.prepare(SimpleStatement.newInstance("SELECT column1 
> from \"kspace\".\"tsTable\" WHERE key = ? AND key2 = ? ORDER BY column1 DESC 
> LIMIT 1").setIdempotent(true));
>  
> {+}Cassandra server audit logs{+}:
> FileAuditLogger.java:51 - 
> ...|type:REQUEST_FAILURE|category:ERROR|ks:kspace|scope:tsTable|operation:SELECT
>  column1 from "kspace"."tsTable" WHERE key = ? AND key2 = ? ORDER BY column1 
> DESC LIMIT 1; Operation timed out - received only 1 responses.
>  
> {+}Cassandra server logs{+}:
> NoSpamLogger.java:104 - ...ReadTimeoutException "Operation timed out - 
> received only 1 responses." while executing SELECT {color:#ff0000}***{color} 
> FROM "kspace"."tsTable" WHERE key = c001c5c2-f0a7-1046-115d-edb4b67ab0d9 AND 
> key2 = '2026-02' ORDER BY column1 DESC, {color:#ff0000}*column2 ASC, column3 
> DESC, column4 DESC*{color} LIMIT 1 {color:#ff0000}*ALLOW FILTERING*{color}
>  
> {+}Replica node logs{+}:
> .. [WARN ] [ReadStage-68] cluster_id=1 ip_address=1.1.1.1  
> NoSpamLogger.java:107 - /2.2.2.2:7000->/3.3.3.3:7000-LARGE_MESSAGES-2acb4e9d 
> overloaded; dropping 1.779MiB message (queue: 131.653MiB local, 127.653MiB 
> endpoint, 127.653MiB global)
> {+}Table Schema{+}:
>  
> ||Column||Type||Key type||
> |key|TIMEUUID|Partition Key|
> |key2|TEXT|Partition Key|
> |column1|BIGINT|Clustering Column ASC|
> |column2|TIMEUUID|Clustering Column DESC|
> |column3|BOOLEAN|Clustering Column ASC|
> |column4|TEXT|Clustering Column ASC|
> |value|BLOB| |
>  
> Attached is the CQL query TRACING output (executed separately) which shows 
> that a message being transmitted from the replica node is the large one.
> Evidently, the query sent by the driver is quite light-weight while the one 
> executed on the server is not, as it tries to fetch all the columns including 
> the blob which is not asked for. This might be supported by the fact that the 
> message happens to be a large one and hence dropped. Besides, the query runs 
> with “ALLOW FILTERING” unexpectedly which is detrimental to the query 
> performance.
>  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to