[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-19597?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=18125450#comment-18125450
]
Stefan Miklosovic edited comment on CASSANDRA-19597 at 10/9/26 9:27 AM:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
anyway, for 4.0 I put this together (1), the mega review identified more issues
with that and addressed all concerns of [~aweisberg] in the PR and in the code.
(1) https://github.com/apache/cassandra/pull/5241/changes
I have not looked at how to backport that from 6.0 yet.
was (Author: smiklosovic):
anyway, for 4.0 I put this together (1), the mega review indetified more issues
with that and addressed all concerns of [~aweisberg] in the PR and in the code.
(1) https://github.com/apache/cassandra/pull/5241/changes
I have not looked at how to backport that from 6.0 yet.
> SystemKeyspace CFS flushing blocked by unrelated keyspace flushing/compaction
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CASSANDRA-19597
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-19597
> Project: Apache Cassandra
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Local/Memtable
> Reporter: Ariel Weisberg
> Assignee: Ariel Weisberg
> Priority: Normal
> Attachments: ci_summary.html
>
> Time Spent: 40m
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> There is a single post flush thread and that thread processes tasks in order
> and one of those tasks can be a memtable flush for an unrelated keyspace/cfs,
> and that memtable flush can be blocked by slow IntervalTree building and
> racing with compactors to try and build an interval tree.
> Unless there is a requirement for ordering we probably want to loosen this to
> the actual ordering requirement so that problems in one keyspace can’t effect
> another.
> SystemKeyspace and Gossip in particular cause lots of weird problems like
> nodes marking each other down because Gossip can’t process nodes being
> removed (blocking flush each time in SystemKeyspace.removeNode)
> A very simple fix here might be to queue the post flush task at the same time
> as the flush in a per CFS queue, and then submit the task only once the flush
> is completed.
> If flushes complete out of order the queue will still ensure their
> completions are processed in order.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]