[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-3641?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13172436#comment-13172436
 ] 

Peter Schuller commented on CASSANDRA-3641:
-------------------------------------------

I'll fix the comment (it was written before I understood fully the role of 
deltas).

As for the JMX counter: I kind of see your concern, but at the same time - most 
people that have monitoring of Cassandra at all will have setups to easily 
monitor/graph/alert on JMX exposed values and I really think it's a shame if we 
can't add additional instrumentation because it would confuse users.

How about putting it somewhere else, where it's clearly nothing you need to 
worry about normally? I actually had an original patch before I submitted 
upstream where I had created a separate MBean I called "RedFlags" because I 
found no good place to put the counter. The idea was that it felt completely 
overkill to have a dedicated MBean for the purpose, but at the same time I 
really wanted it accounted for. RedFlags was intended as a place to put 
counters that you essentially always expect to be exactly 0 during healthy 
production use.

I could see putting more stuff there like exception counts in places where any 
exception indicates a sever problem, or a count of out of disk space conditions 
preventing or affecting (different bucket) compaction, or a count of GC pauses 
above a certain threshold, etc.

If you agree I'll volunteer to go through and add some things I can think of, 
along with this count.

Else I can certainly re-submit without the JMX counter. Or just submit a 
separate JIRA for it (but that's only worth it if you might be okay with a 
RedFlags style approach and it's not just this one counter).

                
> inconsistent/corrupt counters w/ broken shards never converge
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CASSANDRA-3641
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-3641
>             Project: Cassandra
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Peter Schuller
>            Assignee: Peter Schuller
>         Attachments: 3641-0.8-internal-not-for-inclusion.txt, 3641-trunk.txt
>
>
> We ran into a case (which MIGHT be related to CASSANDRA-3070) whereby we had 
> counters that were corrupt (hopefully due to CASSANDRA-3178). The corruption 
> was that there would exist shards with the *same* node_id, *same* clock id, 
> but *different* counts.
> The counter column diffing and reconciliation code assumes that this never 
> happens, and ignores the count. The problem with this is that if there is an 
> inconsistency, the result of a reconciliation will depend on the order of the 
> shards.
> In our case for example, we would see the value of the counter randomly 
> fluctuating on a CL.ALL read, but we would get consistent (whatever the node 
> had) on CL.ONE (submitted to one of the nodes in the replica set for the key).
> In addition, read repair would not work despite digest mismatches because the 
> diffing algorithm also did not care about the counts when determining the 
> differences to send.
> I'm attaching patches that fixes this. The first patch is against our 0.8 
> branch, which is not terribly useful to people, but I include it because it 
> is the well-tested version that we have used on the production cluster which 
> was subject to this corruption.
> The other patch is against trunk, and contains the same change.
> What the patch does is:
> * On diffing, treat as DISJOINT if there is a count discrepancy.
> * On reconciliation, look at the count and *deterministically* pick the 
> higher one, and:
> ** log the fact that we detected a corrupt counter
> ** increment a JMX observable counter for monitoring purposes
> A cluster which is subject to such corruption and has this patch, will fix 
> itself with and AES + compact (or just repeated compactions assuming the 
> replicate-on-compact is able to deliver correctly).

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to