[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-3623?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13174958#comment-13174958
 ] 

Sylvain Lebresne commented on CASSANDRA-3623:
---------------------------------------------

When I was originally checking the compression code, I did a few quick stress 
tests under yourkit, and in cases where the data was small and thus entirely in 
page cache, the cost of creating a RandomAccessFile on each read was taking the 
majority of the time. Note that I'm not saying this to justify this ticket 
necessarily, since:
# we could use an object pool to avoid that cost
# my tests were really toy test, so they would need confirmation
but mmapping does avoid this cost. Just saying.

I'll also note that Snappy has a way to decompress data from direct ByteBuffer 
directly 
([snappydoc|http://wiki.snappy-java.googlecode.com/hg/apidocs/org/xerial/snappy/Snappy.html#compress(java.nio.ByteBuffer,
 java.nio.ByteBuffer)]) so this could potentially avoid 1 copy (we would go 
from page cache to decompressed buffer directly). Of course we should look how 
well that works, but again, just to feed the discussion.
                
> use MMapedBuffer in CompressedSegmentedFile.getSegment
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CASSANDRA-3623
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-3623
>             Project: Cassandra
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Core
>    Affects Versions: 1.1
>            Reporter: Vijay
>            Assignee: Vijay
>              Labels: compression
>             Fix For: 1.1
>
>         Attachments: 0001-MMaped-Compression-segmented-file.patch
>
>
> CompressedSegmentedFile.getSegment seem to open a new file and doesnt seem to 
> use the MMap and hence a higher CPU on the nodes and higher latencies on 
> reads. 
> This ticket is to implement the TODO mentioned in CompressedRandomAccessReader
> // TODO refactor this to separate concept of "buffer to avoid lots of read() 
> syscalls" and "compression buffer"
> but i think a separate class for the Buffer will be better.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to