[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-3623?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13175638#comment-13175638
 ] 

Vijay commented on CASSANDRA-3623:
----------------------------------

Pavel, it doesnt show the opposite it actually shows the time spent is 98% in 
the snappy library and only 2% in the remaining part of the code. Where as in 
the earlier case we spend 58% of the time in Snappy and rest in the other part 
of the code. Snappy/decompression is definitely the bottleneck... all i am 
saying is that now we are more efficient and thats the only bottleneck.

"Did you mean compressed instead of uncompressed here?"
Yes i ment compressed.

Plz try a test before and after the patch you will see what i am talking about, 
I did run the cluster (before and after there isnt any other variable in play 
here) test it for a long time and after this patch shows constat performance 
and doesn't vary a lot (response times after the patch).
                
> use MMapedBuffer in CompressedSegmentedFile.getSegment
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CASSANDRA-3623
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-3623
>             Project: Cassandra
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Core
>    Affects Versions: 1.1
>            Reporter: Vijay
>            Assignee: Vijay
>              Labels: compression
>             Fix For: 1.1
>
>         Attachments: 0001-MMaped-Compression-segmented-file-v2.patch, 
> 0001-MMaped-Compression-segmented-file.patch, 
> 0002-tests-for-MMaped-Compression-segmented-file-v2.patch
>
>
> CompressedSegmentedFile.getSegment seem to open a new file and doesnt seem to 
> use the MMap and hence a higher CPU on the nodes and higher latencies on 
> reads. 
> This ticket is to implement the TODO mentioned in CompressedRandomAccessReader
> // TODO refactor this to separate concept of "buffer to avoid lots of read() 
> syscalls" and "compression buffer"
> but i think a separate class for the Buffer will be better.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to