[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-3634?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13186997#comment-13186997
]
Jonathan Ellis commented on CASSANDRA-3634:
-------------------------------------------
Given that the primary purpose of a "real" PS api is for performance (otherwise
we could just fake it client-side the way we used to with JDBC), and the
feedback from client devs was mixed, I propose that we proceed with the binary
PS api. Client implementers who do not wish to deal with this can continue to
use the pure string based, non-PS API, and they are no worse off than before.
> compare string vs. binary prepared statement parameters
> -------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CASSANDRA-3634
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-3634
> Project: Cassandra
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: API, Core
> Reporter: Eric Evans
> Assignee: Eric Evans
> Priority: Minor
> Labels: cql
> Fix For: 1.1
>
>
> Perform benchmarks to compare the performance of string and pre-serialized
> binary parameters to prepared statements.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
