[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-2478?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Sylvain Lebresne updated CASSANDRA-2478:
----------------------------------------

    Attachment: cql_binary_protocol-v2

I've pushed at https://github.com/pcmanus/cassandra/commits/2478-2 an updated 
version of this patch. I'm also attaching the v2 document describing this new 
version. This version adds to the previous one:
* keyspace and table names to the metadata returned as response to SELECT and 
prepared queries. The protocol supports having different ks/cf names for each 
column, but have a more compact form when all columns are from the same ks/cf 
(which is always the case for SELECT, but not for prepared queries).
* it removes (mostly from the document) the few tidbits about the sketched 
auto-paging. I turns out this is more complicated than I though and may require 
a bit more discussion. So I prefer living that to a follow up ticket.
* a few other cleanups

In this form, this is a "complete" first version in that it is on par with the 
thrift API. So imo it's a good first step and I'd like trying to get that in 
and then adds new features/improve it in separate tickets (SSL, auto-paging, 
consider SASL, etc...). I think the sooner we get a working version in, the 
sooner we'll have people playing with it and get feedback.

                
> Custom CQL protocol/transport
> -----------------------------
>
>                 Key: CASSANDRA-2478
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-2478
>             Project: Cassandra
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: API, Core
>            Reporter: Eric Evans
>            Assignee: Sylvain Lebresne
>            Priority: Minor
>              Labels: cql
>         Attachments: cql_binary_protocol, cql_binary_protocol-v2
>
>
> A custom wire protocol would give us the flexibility to optimize for our 
> specific use-cases, and eliminate a troublesome dependency (I'm referring to 
> Thrift, but none of the others would be significantly better).  Additionally, 
> RPC is bad fit here, and we'd do better to move in the direction of something 
> that natively supports streaming.
> I don't think this is as daunting as it might seem initially.  Utilizing an 
> existing server framework like Netty, combined with some copy-and-paste of 
> bits from other FLOSS projects would probably get us 80% of the way there.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to