[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-1337?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Sylvain Lebresne reopened CASSANDRA-1337:
-----------------------------------------


I'm sorry but I still don't see how that handle correctly 2ndary indexes (in 
the non-CQL3 case, fine for putting CQL3 to a following ticket if you prefer).

Also, the parallelHandlers integer of the "fix" doesn't really work. Suppose 
you have a concurrencyFactor of 2 but > 2 ranges. If the first range happens to 
be a local range, you'll decrement parallelHandlers and so the following 
queries we be done serially, while they should be done 2 by 2 in parallel.  
Besides, why is the local case a special case in the first place? It feels like 
if we're parallelizing queries, there is no reason not to parallelize the local 
path too.

                
> parallelize fetching rows for low-cardinality indexes
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CASSANDRA-1337
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-1337
>             Project: Cassandra
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Jonathan Ellis
>            Assignee: David Alves
>             Fix For: 1.2
>
>         Attachments: 
> 0001-CASSANDRA-1337-scan-concurrently-depending-on-num-rows.txt, 
> 1137-bugfix.patch, CASSANDRA-1337.patch
>
>   Original Estimate: 8h
>  Remaining Estimate: 8h
>
> currently, we read the indexed rows from the first node (in partitioner 
> order); if that does not have enough matching rows, we read the rows from the 
> next, and so forth.
> we should use the statistics fom CASSANDRA-1155 to query multiple nodes in 
> parallel, such that we have a high chance of getting enough rows w/o having 
> to do another round of queries (but, if our estimate is incorrect, we do need 
> to loop and do more rounds until we have enough data or we have fetched from 
> each node).

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to