[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-4310?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13460582#comment-13460582
 ] 

Jonathan Ellis commented on CASSANDRA-4310:
-------------------------------------------

bq. there are no more idle executor threads 

Worth elaborating that we have slightly conflicting goals here:

# we want to keep all {{concurrent_compactor}} threads busy
# but, we don't want to enqueue tasks farther in advance than we need to, since 
more information can become available due to other flushes or compactions 
finishing in the meantime, that allows us to create a more optimal task

So I think what we want is to track "currently being compacted CFs" in 
CompactionManager.  If a CF is currently being compacted, and there are no idle 
threads, submitBackground can be a no-op; we can wait for the current 
compaction to finish and re-submit when more information is available.  
Otherwise, we should submit at least one task to prevent starvation by busier 
CFs, and more if there are idle threads still.
                
> Multiple independent Level Compactions in Parallel
> --------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CASSANDRA-4310
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-4310
>             Project: Cassandra
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: Core
>    Affects Versions: 1.0.0
>            Reporter: sankalp kohli
>            Assignee: Yuki Morishita
>              Labels: compaction, features, leveled, performance, ssd
>             Fix For: 1.2.1
>
>         Attachments: 4310.txt
>
>
> Problem: If you are inserting data into cassandra and level compaction cannot 
> catchup, you will create lot of files in L0.  
> Here is a solution which will help here and also increase the performance of 
> level compaction.
> We can do many compactions in parallel for unrelated data.
> 1) For no over lapping levels. Ex: when L0 stable is compacting with L1, we 
> can do compactions in other levels like L2 and L3 if they are eligible.
> 2) We can also do compactions with files in L1 which are not participating in 
> L0 compactions.
> This is specially useful if you are using SSD and is not bottlenecked by IO. 
> I am seeing this issue in my cluster. The compactions pending are more than 
> 50k and the disk usage is not that much(I am using SSD).
> I am doing multithreaded to true and also not throttling the IO by putting 
> the value as 0. 
>  

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to