[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-4963?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Sylvain Lebresne resolved CASSANDRA-4963.
-----------------------------------------

    Resolution: Not A Problem

This works as designed. When a TTL is used in a statement, it only applies to 
the _values_ that this statement updates/inserts.

For the record, I'm not contesting that "a collection only ever have a TTL as a 
whole and if a statement with a TTL updates/inserts a collection, it sets that 
collection TTL" wouldn't be a valid alternative semantic (at least on paper), 
but I do pretend that the current semantic is superior in practice because:
# It's more generic/flexible. You can implement the 'the collection has a TTL 
as a whole' semantic using the current one client side (at least you can 
implement it as well as we could internally). The reverse is not true.
# Implementing that latter semantic would require us to do a read before we 
write (even when no ttl is used because you'd always have to know if the 
collection already exists with a ttl, which is a no go in itself) and to have 
some distributed locking (or at least I don't see how we could guarantee 
otherwise that all the internal columns composing the collection always have 
the same TTL).

                
> A cql collection 'column' doesn't own it's ttl
> ----------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CASSANDRA-4963
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-4963
>             Project: Cassandra
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Core
>    Affects Versions: 1.2.0 beta 2
>            Reporter: Dave Brosius
>            Priority: Minor
>
> if you add a collection column with a ttl, then later update the collection 
> by adding a new element, the 'under the covers' column representing the added 
> value has no ttl. It seems like ttl tombstoning should only be allowed to 
> remove the collection in entirety, or not touch it, but not be allowed to 
> modify it by removing parts.
> example
> cqlsh> create keyspace collections with replication = 
> {'class':'SimpleStrategy', 'replication_factor':1};
> cqlsh> use collections;
> cqlsh:collections> create table collections (key int primary key, aset 
> set<text>);
> cqlsh:collections> insert into collections (key, aset) values (1, {'fee', 
> 'fi'}) using ttl 10000;
> cqlsh:collections> update collections set aset = aset + {'fo', 'fum'} where 
> key = 1;
> cqlsh:collections> exit
> cassandra-cli
> [default@unknown] use collections
> [default@collections] get collections[1];
> => (column=, value=, timestamp=1352874321877000)
> => (column=aset:666565, value=, timestamp=1352874314717000, ttl=10000)
> => (column=aset:6669, value=, timestamp=1352874314717000, ttl=10000)
> => (column=aset:666f, value=, timestamp=1352874321877000)
> => (column=aset:66756d, value=, timestamp=1352874321877000)

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to