[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-4775?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13546035#comment-13546035
]
Srdjan Mitrovic commented on CASSANDRA-4775:
--------------------------------------------
Don't atomic batched have potential for a retry mechanism?
Now that CASSANDRA-4285 has been resolved can't you use Atomic batches to have
idempotent counters? If we put in the same batch both incr and adding a wide
row cell we could later see if we have a cell and not execute that batch again.
I apologize if there is something fundamentally wrong in my understanding of
how cassandra batches work so in that case please delete my message so that it
doesn't derail the issue.
> Counters 2.0
> ------------
>
> Key: CASSANDRA-4775
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-4775
> Project: Cassandra
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: Core
> Reporter: Arya Goudarzi
> Labels: counters
> Fix For: 2.0
>
>
> The existing partitioned counters remain a source of frustration for most
> users almost two years after being introduced. The remaining problems are
> inherent in the design, not something that can be fixed given enough
> time/eyeballs.
> Ideally a solution would give us
> - similar performance
> - less special cases in the code
> - potential for a retry mechanism
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
