[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-4775?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13623787#comment-13623787
]
Jonathan Ellis commented on CASSANDRA-4775:
-------------------------------------------
bq. The implementation becomes a fair bit more complicated
I'm not really sure about that. Both with this and the above design [1], we do
have more complexity on read/reconcile, but we trade that for zero special
cases at the storage engine, which is a huge win.
[1]
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-4775?focusedCommentId=13586715&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-13586715
> Counters 2.0
> ------------
>
> Key: CASSANDRA-4775
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-4775
> Project: Cassandra
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: Core
> Reporter: Arya Goudarzi
> Assignee: Aleksey Yeschenko
> Labels: counters
> Fix For: 2.0
>
>
> The existing partitioned counters remain a source of frustration for most
> users almost two years after being introduced. The remaining problems are
> inherent in the design, not something that can be fixed given enough
> time/eyeballs.
> Ideally a solution would give us
> - similar performance
> - less special cases in the code
> - potential for a retry mechanism
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
