[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-5351?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13773178#comment-13773178
]
Benjamin Coverston commented on CASSANDRA-5351:
-----------------------------------------------
I think this is a good idea. In fact, triggering when the un-repaired size gets
to be above some configured threshold means that repairs can be tuned for your
environment. If we had a set of SSTables that are 'repaired', another 'pending
repair', and another set of 'not yet scheduled for repair' (or queued for
future repair) you could actually monitor your system to see if repairs are
'keeping up' with your data volumes.
> Avoid repairing already-repaired data by default
> ------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CASSANDRA-5351
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-5351
> Project: Cassandra
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: Core
> Reporter: Jonathan Ellis
> Assignee: Lyuben Todorov
> Labels: repair
> Fix For: 2.1
>
>
> Repair has always built its merkle tree from all the data in a columnfamily,
> which is guaranteed to work but is inefficient.
> We can improve this by remembering which sstables have already been
> successfully repaired, and only repairing sstables new since the last repair.
> (This automatically makes CASSANDRA-3362 much less of a problem too.)
> The tricky part is, compaction will (if not taught otherwise) mix repaired
> data together with non-repaired. So we should segregate unrepaired sstables
> from the repaired ones.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
