[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-6137?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13799216#comment-13799216
]
Constance Eustace commented on CASSANDRA-6137:
----------------------------------------------
I'm about to do a mandated OS upgrade. I will try HEAD when it comes back up
> CQL3 SELECT IN CLAUSE inconsistent
> ----------------------------------
>
> Key: CASSANDRA-6137
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-6137
> Project: Cassandra
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Core
> Environment: Ubuntu AWS Cassandra 2.0.1 SINGLE NODE on EBS RAID
> storage
> OSX Cassandra 1.2.8 on SSD storage
> Reporter: Constance Eustace
> Priority: Minor
>
> I am elevating this to Critical after doing some trace and reproducing in
> several environments. No one has commented on this bug from the cassandra
> team, and I view unreliable/corrupted data a pretty big deal. We are
> considering pulling cassandra and using something else.
> We have the data state reproduced locally in an environment that we can set
> TRACE logging, attach a debugger, etc. Some guidance as to where to look
> would be greatly appreciated.
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> We are encountering inconsistent results from CQL3 queries with column keys
> using IN clause in WHERE. This has been reproduced in cqlsh and the jdbc
> driver.
> Rowkey is e_entid
> Column key is p_prop
> This returns roughly 21 rows for 21 column keys that match p_prop.
> cqlsh> SELECT
> e_entid,e_entname,e_enttype,p_prop,p_flags,p_propid,e_entlinks,p_proplinks,p_subents,p_val,p_vallinks,p_vars
> FROM internal_submission.Entity_Job WHERE e_entid =
> '845b38f1-2b91-11e3-854d-126aad0075d4-CJOB';
> These three queries each return one row for the requested single column key
> in the IN clause:
> SELECT
> e_entid,e_entname,e_enttype,p_prop,p_flags,p_propid,e_entlinks,p_proplinks,p_subents,p_val,p_vallinks,p_vars
> FROM internal_submission.Entity_Job WHERE e_entid =
> '845b38f1-2b91-11e3-854d-126aad0075d4-CJOB' AND p_prop in
> ('urn:bby:pcm:job:ingest:content:complete:count');
> SELECT
> e_entid,e_entname,e_enttype,p_prop,p_flags,p_propid,e_entlinks,p_proplinks,p_subents,p_val,p_vallinks,p_vars
> FROM internal_submission.Entity_Job WHERE e_entid =
> '845b38f1-2b91-11e3-854d-126aad0075d4-CJOB' AND p_prop in
> ('urn:bby:pcm:job:ingest:content:all:count');
> SELECT
> e_entid,e_entname,e_enttype,p_prop,p_flags,p_propid,e_entlinks,p_proplinks,p_subents,p_val,p_vallinks,p_vars
> FROM internal_submission.Entity_Job WHERE e_entid =
> '845b38f1-2b91-11e3-854d-126aad0075d4-CJOB' AND p_prop in
> ('urn:bby:pcm:job:ingest:content:fail:count');
> This query returns ONLY ONE ROW (one column key), not three as I would expect
> from the three-column-key IN clause:
> cqlsh> SELECT
> e_entid,e_entname,e_enttype,p_prop,p_flags,p_propid,e_entlinks,p_proplinks,p_subents,p_val,p_vallinks,p_vars
> FROM internal_submission.Entity_Job WHERE e_entid =
> '845b38f1-2b91-11e3-854d-126aad0075d4-CJOB' AND p_prop in
> ('urn:bby:pcm:job:ingest:content:complete:count','urn:bby:pcm:job:ingest:content:all:count','urn:bby:pcm:job:ingest:content:fail:count');
> This query does return two rows however for the requested two column keys:
> cqlsh> SELECT
> e_entid,e_entname,e_enttype,p_prop,p_flags,p_propid,e_entlinks,p_proplinks,p_subents,p_val,p_vallinks,p_vars
> FROM internal_submission.Entity_Job WHERE e_entid =
> '845b38f1-2b91-11e3-854d-126aad0075d4-CJOB' AND p_prop in (
>
> 'urn:bby:pcm:job:ingest:content:all:count','urn:bby:pcm:job:ingest:content:fail:count');
> cqlsh> describe table internal_submission.entity_job;
> CREATE TABLE entity_job (
> e_entid text,
> p_prop text,
> describes text,
> dndcondition text,
> e_entlinks text,
> e_entname text,
> e_enttype text,
> ingeststatus text,
> ingeststatusdetail text,
> p_flags text,
> p_propid text,
> p_proplinks text,
> p_storage text,
> p_subents text,
> p_val text,
> p_vallang text,
> p_vallinks text,
> p_valtype text,
> p_valunit text,
> p_vars text,
> partnerid text,
> referenceid text,
> size int,
> sourceip text,
> submitdate bigint,
> submitevent text,
> userid text,
> version text,
> PRIMARY KEY (e_entid, p_prop)
> ) WITH
> bloom_filter_fp_chance=0.010000 AND
> caching='KEYS_ONLY' AND
> comment='' AND
> dclocal_read_repair_chance=0.000000 AND
> gc_grace_seconds=864000 AND
> index_interval=128 AND
> read_repair_chance=0.100000 AND
> replicate_on_write='true' AND
> populate_io_cache_on_flush='false' AND
> default_time_to_live=0 AND
> speculative_retry='NONE' AND
> memtable_flush_period_in_ms=0 AND
> compaction={'class': 'SizeTieredCompactionStrategy'} AND
> compression={'sstable_compression': 'LZ4Compressor'};
> CREATE INDEX internal_submission__JobDescribesIDX ON entity_job (describes);
> CREATE INDEX internal_submission__JobDNDConditionIDX ON entity_job
> (dndcondition);
> CREATE INDEX internal_submission__JobIngestStatusIDX ON entity_job
> (ingeststatus);
> CREATE INDEX internal_submission__JobIngestStatusDetailIDX ON entity_job
> (ingeststatusdetail);
> CREATE INDEX internal_submission__JobReferenceIDIDX ON entity_job
> (referenceid);
> CREATE INDEX internal_submission__JobUserIDX ON entity_job (userid);
> CREATE INDEX internal_submission__JobVersionIDX ON entity_job (version);
> -------------------------------
> My suspicion is that the three-column-key IN Clause is translated (improperly
> or not) to a two-column key range with the assumption that the third column
> key is present in that range, but it isn't...
> -----------------------------------
> We have tried: nodetool cache invalidations, start/stop of cassandra. Those
> did NOT fix the problem. A table dump (COPY TO) and then reload (COPY FROM)
> does fix the rows, but then more corruption creeps in.
> We are using the cassandra-jdbc driver, but I don't see anything wrong with
> the issued statements inside the cassandra source code when I step through
> the code.
> With additional writes, it may be possible that some rows get fixed.
> Compaction or other jobs may repair this, but on the timescale of hours done
> debugging, the failures are consistent.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1#6144)
