[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-6259?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13807883#comment-13807883
 ] 

Sylvain Lebresne commented on CASSANDRA-6259:
---------------------------------------------

Well, I'm not able to reproduce. As far as I can tell, the sockets are properly 
closed by the native transport whenever the connection is closed client side.  
Is there any exception in the server log that would indicate something wrong?

But what confuses me a bit is the fact you said using the cascading client and 
mentioning map reduce jobs. As far as I can tell, 
https://github.com/ifesdjeen/cascading-cassandra uses Cassandra's 
ColumnFamilyInputFormat which uses thrift exclusively, not the native 
transport. But the port mentionned above, 9042, is indeed the default port for 
the native protocol. So do you use another client that cassanding-cassandra?  
One that would indeed use the native protocol?


> Cassandra 2.0.1 server has too many tcp connections in CLOSE_WAIT
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CASSANDRA-6259
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-6259
>             Project: Cassandra
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Prateek
>            Assignee: Sylvain Lebresne
>
> We are using cassandra 2.0.1 server with cascading client. The cassandra tap 
> used is https://github.com/ifesdjeen/cascading-cassandra (1.0.0-rc6). The 
> problem arises after the server is running for a few days. The server has 
> 100,000+ connections in tcp CLOSE_WAIT state and cannot accept any more 
> connections. All map reduce jobs start failing. This seems to be a bug with 
> cassandra 2.0.1 server not closing connections properly.
> [(bloomreach-ami) ubuntu@ip-10-91-15-6 :/mnt/cassandra/data]# lsof -n | grep 
> java | grep CLOSE_WAIT | wc -l
> 116321
> java      25427          ubuntu *537u     IPv4            9337512        0t0  
>       TCP 10.91.15.6:9042->10.171.11.168:34217 (CLOSE_WAIT)
> java      25427          ubuntu *540u     IPv4            9107933        0t0  
>       TCP 10.91.15.6:9042->10.92.99.19:45820 (CLOSE_WAIT)
> java      25427          ubuntu *543u     IPv4            9110100        0t0  
>       TCP 10.91.15.6:9042->10.86.106.249:47585 (CLOSE_WAIT)
> java      25427          ubuntu *544u     IPv4            9110072        0t0  
>       TCP 10.91.15.6:9042->10.86.106.249:47364 (CLOSE_WAIT)
> java      25427          ubuntu *546u     IPv4            9110110        0t0  
>       TCP 10.91.15.6:9042->10.92.99.19:46162 (CLOSE_WAIT)
> java      25427          ubuntu *547u     IPv4            9110093        0t0  
>       TCP 10.91.15.6:9042->10.86.106.249:47518 (CLOSE_WAIT)
> java      25427          ubuntu *548u     IPv4            9337583        0t0  
>       TCP 10.91.15.6:9042->10.171.11.168:34361 (CLOSE_WAIT)
> java      25427          ubuntu *549u     IPv4            9110114        0t0  
>       TCP 10.91.15.6:9042->10.92.99.19:46212 (CLOSE_WAIT)
> java      25427          ubuntu *551u     IPv4            9110117        0t0  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1#6144)

Reply via email to