[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-5549?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13874786#comment-13874786
]
Benedict edited comment on CASSANDRA-5549 at 1/17/14 1:31 PM:
--------------------------------------------------------------
I realised as I was going to sleep this morning (strangely the best time to
realise you've made a mistake, I find) that my fix for the bug was itself
busted. Re-uploaded minor tweak to the branch.
was (Author: benedict):
I realised as I was going to sleep this morning (strangely the best time to
realise you've made a mistake, I find) that my fix for the bugfix was itself
busted. Re-uploaded minor tweak to the branch.
> Remove Table.switchLock
> -----------------------
>
> Key: CASSANDRA-5549
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-5549
> Project: Cassandra
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Jonathan Ellis
> Assignee: Benedict
> Labels: performance
> Fix For: 2.1
>
> Attachments: 5549-removed-switchlock.png, 5549-sunnyvale.png
>
>
> As discussed in CASSANDRA-5422, Table.switchLock is a bottleneck on the write
> path. ReentrantReadWriteLock is not lightweight, even if there is no
> contention per se between readers and writers of the lock (in Cassandra,
> memtable updates and switches).
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1.5#6160)
