[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-6688?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13897933#comment-13897933
]
Jonathan Ellis commented on CASSANDRA-6688:
-------------------------------------------
bq. Second case is where we try to include as many overlapping L0 sstables as
possible, here we could add sstables that are not compacting, but overlap
sstables that are.
This affects 1.2 as well right?
> Avoid possible sstable overlaps with leveled compaction
> -------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CASSANDRA-6688
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-6688
> Project: Cassandra
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Marcus Eriksson
> Assignee: Marcus Eriksson
> Attachments: 0001-6688.patch
>
>
> Two cases where we can end up with overlapping sstables in the leveled
> manifest;
> FIrst one is when we skip levels during compaction. Here we need to make sure
> we are not compacting in newLevel - 1 since if, for example, we are doing a
> L1 -> L2 compaction and then start a new L0 compaction where we decide to
> skip L1, we could have overlapping sstables in L2 when the compactions are
> done. This case is new in 2.0 since we check if we skip levels before the
> compaction starts.
> Second case is where we try to include as many overlapping L0 sstables as
> possible, here we could add sstables that are not compacting, but overlap
> sstables that are.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1.5#6160)
