[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-6553?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13935660#comment-13935660
]
Russ Hatch commented on CASSANDRA-6553:
---------------------------------------
So it seems like the wishlist for more testing might include:
* mixed read/write test(s) (maybe a write-heavy and a read-heavy profile, say
10:1)
* [~iamaleksey] mentioned "there are some other scenarios to test - when the
read before write hits the disk, for example" (not sure how to approach testing
this -- or would this be exercised by a read-heavy workload mentioned above?)
* tests with counter cache disabled, mentioned by [~slebresne] (would this
require a patched version of cassandra or is there a simpler way to do this?)
any comments on the above or other scenarios I can help out with?
> Benchmark counter improvements (counters++)
> -------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CASSANDRA-6553
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-6553
> Project: Cassandra
> Issue Type: Test
> Reporter: Ryan McGuire
> Assignee: Russ Hatch
> Fix For: 2.1 beta2
>
> Attachments: 6553.uber.quorum.bdplab.read.png,
> 6553.uber.quorum.bdplab.write.png, high_cl_one.png, high_cl_quorum.png,
> low_cl_one.png, low_cl_quorum.png, uber_cl_one.png, uber_cl_quorum.png
>
>
> Benchmark the difference in performance between CASSANDRA-6504 and trunk.
> * Updating totally unrelated counters (different partitions)
> * Updating the same counters a lot (same cells in the same partition)
> * Different cells in the same few partitions (hot counter partition)
> benchmark:
> https://github.com/apache/cassandra/tree/1218bcacba7edefaf56cf8440d0aea5794c89a1e
> (old counters)
> compared to:
> https://github.com/apache/cassandra/tree/714c423360c36da2a2b365efaf9c5c4f623ed133
> (new counters)
> So far, the above changes should only affect the write path.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)
