[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-6689?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13942958#comment-13942958
 ] 

Benedict commented on CASSANDRA-6689:
-------------------------------------

Can everyone please settle on what functionality is desired for this 
ticket/release, so I do not need to keep reorganising it. I am in the middle of 
rebasing and reorganising it again, but I will wait until some consensus is 
reached. If we only want #2 (#1 is useless on its own), the patch set will be 
quite different; I will drop all of the refactoring. If we plan to include #3 
(note that this quite provably reduces fixed on-heap overhead by a minimum of 
75%, and easily > 90% for clustering columns), I will retain #1 with some minor 
tweaks, and do my best to further make the commits incremental, but I am not 
going to completely reorder everything for no good reason.


> Partially Off Heap Memtables
> ----------------------------
>
>                 Key: CASSANDRA-6689
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-6689
>             Project: Cassandra
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: Core
>            Reporter: Benedict
>            Assignee: Benedict
>              Labels: performance
>             Fix For: 2.1 beta2
>
>         Attachments: CASSANDRA-6689-small-changes.patch
>
>
> Move the contents of ByteBuffers off-heap for records written to a memtable.
> (See comments for details)



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)

Reply via email to