[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-4718?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13997515#comment-13997515
 ] 

Benedict commented on CASSANDRA-4718:
-------------------------------------

bq. Also most of the use cases is exactly that - data set which exceeds 
available memory

Well, except that we expect in general for recent data to be accessed most 
often, or data to be accessed according to a zipf distribution, and in both of 
these cases caching helps to keep a significant portion of the data we're 
accessing in memory. Also, more users are getting incredibly performant SSDs 
that can respond to queries in time horizons measured in microseconds, and as 
this becomes the norm the distinction also becomes less important.

> More-efficient ExecutorService for improved throughput
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CASSANDRA-4718
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-4718
>             Project: Cassandra
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Jonathan Ellis
>            Assignee: Benedict
>            Priority: Minor
>              Labels: performance
>             Fix For: 2.1.0
>
>         Attachments: 4718-v1.patch, PerThreadQueue.java, aws.svg, 
> aws_read.svg, backpressure-stress.out.txt, baq vs trunk.png, 
> belliotsmith_branches-stress.out.txt, jason_read.svg, jason_read_latency.svg, 
> jason_write.svg, op costs of various queues.ods, stress op rate with various 
> queues.ods, v1-stress.out
>
>
> Currently all our execution stages dequeue tasks one at a time.  This can 
> result in contention between producers and consumers (although we do our best 
> to minimize this by using LinkedBlockingQueue).
> One approach to mitigating this would be to make consumer threads do more 
> work in "bulk" instead of just one task per dequeue.  (Producer threads tend 
> to be single-task oriented by nature, so I don't see an equivalent 
> opportunity there.)
> BlockingQueue has a drainTo(collection, int) method that would be perfect for 
> this.  However, no ExecutorService in the jdk supports using drainTo, nor 
> could I google one.
> What I would like to do here is create just such a beast and wire it into (at 
> least) the write and read stages.  (Other possible candidates for such an 
> optimization, such as the CommitLog and OutboundTCPConnection, are not 
> ExecutorService-based and will need to be one-offs.)
> AbstractExecutorService may be useful.  The implementations of 
> ICommitLogExecutorService may also be useful. (Despite the name these are not 
> actual ExecutorServices, although they share the most important properties of 
> one.)



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)

Reply via email to