[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-4718?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13998639#comment-13998639
 ] 

Benedict commented on CASSANDRA-4718:
-------------------------------------

bq. Since we're talking about benchmarks, it shouldn't be too hard to remove 
batching from the equation and check what value remains.

The batching has already been committed to tip, so the 2.1-batchnetty is 
essentially this.

bq. Can we bench with compression maybe?

We probably should bench to get a comparison. It is quite likely the benefit 
will be lost, given we decompress 64K chunks at a time and currently have no 
uncompressed page cache.

> More-efficient ExecutorService for improved throughput
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CASSANDRA-4718
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-4718
>             Project: Cassandra
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Jonathan Ellis
>            Assignee: Benedict
>            Priority: Minor
>              Labels: performance
>             Fix For: 2.1.0
>
>         Attachments: 4718-v1.patch, PerThreadQueue.java, aws.svg, 
> aws_read.svg, backpressure-stress.out.txt, baq vs trunk.png, 
> belliotsmith_branches-stress.out.txt, jason_read.svg, jason_read_latency.svg, 
> jason_write.svg, op costs of various queues.ods, stress op rate with various 
> queues.ods, v1-stress.out
>
>
> Currently all our execution stages dequeue tasks one at a time.  This can 
> result in contention between producers and consumers (although we do our best 
> to minimize this by using LinkedBlockingQueue).
> One approach to mitigating this would be to make consumer threads do more 
> work in "bulk" instead of just one task per dequeue.  (Producer threads tend 
> to be single-task oriented by nature, so I don't see an equivalent 
> opportunity there.)
> BlockingQueue has a drainTo(collection, int) method that would be perfect for 
> this.  However, no ExecutorService in the jdk supports using drainTo, nor 
> could I google one.
> What I would like to do here is create just such a beast and wire it into (at 
> least) the write and read stages.  (Other possible candidates for such an 
> optimization, such as the CommitLog and OutboundTCPConnection, are not 
> ExecutorService-based and will need to be one-offs.)
> AbstractExecutorService may be useful.  The implementations of 
> ICommitLogExecutorService may also be useful. (Despite the name these are not 
> actual ExecutorServices, although they share the most important properties of 
> one.)



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)

Reply via email to