[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-7432?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14089294#comment-14089294
 ] 

Joshua McKenzie commented on CASSANDRA-7432:
--------------------------------------------

Created CASSANDRA-7714 to track the Windows side.

> Add new CMS GC flags to cassandra_env.sh for JVM later than 1.7.0_60
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CASSANDRA-7432
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-7432
>             Project: Cassandra
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Packaging
>            Reporter: graham sanderson
>            Assignee: Brandon Williams
>             Fix For: 2.0.10, 2.1.1
>
>         Attachments: 7432.txt
>
>
> The new flags in question are as follows:
> {code}
> -XX:+CMSParallelInitialMarkEnabled
> -XX:+CMSEdenChunksRecordAlways
> {code}
> Given we already have
> {code}
> JVM_OPTS="$JVM_OPTS -XX:+UseParNewGC" 
> JVM_OPTS="$JVM_OPTS -XX:+UseConcMarkSweepGC" 
> JVM_OPTS="$JVM_OPTS -XX:+CMSParallelRemarkEnabled" 
> JVM_OPTS="$JVM_OPTS -XX:+UseTLAB"
> if [ "$JVM_ARCH" = "64-Bit" ] ; then
>     JVM_OPTS="$JVM_OPTS -XX:+UseCondCardMark"
> fi
> {code}
> The assumption would be that people are at least running on large number CPU 
> cores/threads
> I would therefore recommend defaulting these flags if available - the only 
> two possible downsides for {{+CMSEdenChunksRecordAlways}}:
> 1) There is a new very short (probably un-contended) lock in the "slow" (non 
> TLAB) eden allocation path with {{+CMSEdenChunksRecordAlways}}. I haven't 
> detected this timing wise - this is the "slow" path after all
> 2) If you are running with {{-XX:-UseCMSCompactAtFullCollection}} (not the 
> default) *and* you call {{System.gc()}} then  {{+CMSEdenChunksRecordAlways}} 
> will expose you to a possible seg fault: (see
> [http://bugs.java.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=8021809])



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)

Reply via email to