[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAY-2881?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Nikita Timofeev updated CAY-2881:
---------------------------------
Fix Version/s: 5.0-M3
(was: 5.0-M2)
> Switch to standard JDBC approach to read/write java.time classes
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CAY-2881
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAY-2881
> Project: Cayenne
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Andrus Adamchik
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 5.0-M3
>
>
> On most databases, we no longer need ValueObjectTypes for java.time classes,
> as demonstrated by CAY-2701 for modern MySQL (also see
> https://dev.mysql.com/blog-archive/support-for-date-time-types-in-connector-j-8-0/
> ) :
> {noformat}
> rs.getObject(i, LocalDateTime.class);
> st.setObject(pos, val, type);
> {noformat}
> So let's make the approach in CAY-2701 the default in Cayenne, creating the
> appropriate ExtendedTypes, and then check which databases DO NOT support it,
> and create custom ExtendedTypes for those.
> Of course, as a result MySQLLocalDateTimeType will no longer be needed,
> superseded by the standard one.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
