DaanHoogland commented on PR #10612:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/10612#issuecomment-2862409288
@weizhouapache
with no source nat:
```
🐱 > restart network id=1b4351d0-1f7c-4cde-a5ed-8fd8ea54f004
makeredundant=true
{
"account": "admin",
"accountid": "ea229261-2b47-11f0-bc4c-1e006900026d",
"cmd": "org.apache.cloudstack.api.command.user.network.RestartNetworkCmd",
"completed": "2025-05-08T08:19:52+0000",
"created": "2025-05-08T08:19:52+0000",
"domainid": "a67d0cd0-2b47-11f0-bc4c-1e006900026d",
"domainpath": "ROOT",
"jobid": "71b63e4c-0d24-493a-97a9-ca2d4904ba6b",
"jobinstancetype": "Network",
"jobprocstatus": 0,
"jobresult": {
"errorcode": 530,
"errortext": "Service SourceNat is not supported by the network offering
com.cloud.api.query.vo.NetworkOfferingJoinVO$$EnhancerByCGLIB$$4334c8a8@8b"
},
"jobresultcode": 530,
"jobresulttype": "object",
"jobstatus": 2,
"userid": "ea2473ef-2b47-11f0-bc4c-1e006900026d"
}
```
, so that’s good.
On disabling redundant routers and restarting however:
```
🐱 > restart vpc makeredundant=true id=1e91b16e-9c4b-42ec-914b-851c744da064
{
"success": true
}
```
I tried these scenarios with isolated, vpc and shared networks. All the same
results.
cc @sureshanaparti
I think we can merge this, and consider the redundant scenario valid for
shared networks.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
