luganofer opened a new issue, #13975:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/13975

   ### Component
   UI
   
   ### Affected Version
   all versions
   
   ### Severity
   Moderate – causes operational confusion, resource misallocation, and 
unnecessary support tickets
   
   ---
   
   ### Description
   
   The current "Add Account" form in the CloudStack UI is a major source of 
confusion, especially for administrators who are not deeply familiar with 
CloudStack's account‑user model. The term "Account" is often misinterpreted as 
a user profile, leading to the unintended creation of separate accounts in the 
same domain when the actual goal is simply to add a new user to an existing 
account.
   
   This confusion has real operational consequences, particularly in 
multi‑tenant environments.
   
   ---
   
   ### Real‑World Scenario
   
   In our onboarding flow for a new tenant:
   
   1. We create a **parent domain** where all contracted resources are 
allocated.
   2. Inside that domain, we create a **single account** of type `domain admin` 
with **one initial user** (the primary administrator for that tenant).
   
   This is a standard and correct setup.
   
   However, when the tenant later needs to add a **second user** (e.g., a 
regular operator) to the **same account**, the administrator goes to the UI and 
clicks the visible **"Add Account"** button – because that is the only obvious 
action presented.
   
   They naturally assume they are adding a new user to the current account.
   
   In reality, they are creating a **brand new, separate account** with its own 
resource limits, quotas, and isolated resource pool.
   
   ---
   
   ### Consequences of This Confusion
   
   #### 1. Incorrect Resource Limits
   The newly created account uses default limits, which almost never match the 
contracted quota for the tenant. When the new user logs in, they see a 
different set of available resources than expected, leading to confusion and 
support escalations.
   
   #### 2. Unintended Resource Isolation
   All resources (VMs, volumes, snapshots, networks) deployed by the new user 
belong to the **new account**, not the tenant's primary account. Users within 
the same tenant are therefore unable to share or even see each other's 
resources – which violates the expected multi‑user, shared‑resource model 
within a single account.
   
   ---
   
   ### Proposed Solution
   
   The UI should clearly distinguish between **creating a new tenant account** 
and **adding a user to an existing account**.
   
   #### 1. Rename / Relabel the Current Button
   - Change the **"Add Account"** button label to something explicit, such as:  
     **"New Tenant Account"**
   - This signals that the action creates a separate billing/resource entity.
   
   #### 2. Add a Dedicated "Add User" Action
   - Inside the account details view, add a clearly visible button labeled:  
     **"Add User to this Account"**
   - This action would open a simplified form that only asks for:
     - Username
     - Password
     - Confirm password
     - Email
     - First name
     - Last name
     - Timezone
   - The new user would inherit the account's existing role and resource limits.
   
   #### 3. Add a Prominent Warning in the Current Form
   Display a clear warning message at the top of the "Add Account" form, e.g.:
   
   > ⚠️ **Warning:** Creating a new account creates a separate tenant with its 
own resource limits and isolated resources. Users in different accounts cannot 
share VMs or volumes.  Networks can be shared between accounts when the 
appropriate permissions are granted.  To add a new user to an existing account, 
please use the **"Add User"** option available from the account detail view.
   
   ---
   
   ### Expected vs. Actual Behavior
   
   | **Expected** | **Actual** |
   |---------------|------------|
   | A clear, separate workflow for creating a new tenant vs. adding a user to 
an existing tenant. | Only one unified "Add Account" interface exists, which 
heavily suggests account creation even when the intent is user addition. |
   | Users within the same account share resources by default. | Unintended 
multiple accounts cause resource fragmentation and isolation. |
   
   ---
   
   ### Related Community Discussions
   
   This confusion has been noted before in the community:
   
   - [Issue #4227](https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/4227) – touches 
on account/user ambiguity.
   - [Discussion 
#10380](https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/discussions/10380) – user 
confusion around account vs. user creation.
   
   The underlying model is clear: an **account** owns resources and defines the 
role; a **user** is simply a credential to access that account. The UI should 
reflect this more intuitively.
   
   ---
   
   ### Additional Context
   
   This is not a bug in the backend logic – the system behaves correctly. The 
problem is purely a **UX/UI design issue** that leads to preventable 
misconfigurations. Improving the interface would:
   
   - Reduce support overhead.
   - Lower the learning curve for new CloudStack administrators.
   - Prevent accidental multi‑account sprawl in production environments.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to