github-actions[bot] commented on issue #14003:
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/14003#issuecomment-5456437414

   ## ๐ŸŽฏ Triage report
   
   Feature request to add WireGuard as a VPN option on the Virtual Router, 
alongside existing L2TP remote-access and IPsec site-to-site support. The 
author cites real production pain points with IPsec (NAT traversal, negotiation 
complexity, CPU cost) and references a previously closed, unmerged PR (#9977) 
and a CCC 2024 talk as prior design/implementation groundwork.
   
   ### ๐Ÿ“Š Assessment
   
   | Dimension | Value | Reasoning |
   |---|---|---|
   | **Type** | type:new-feature | Clearly a request for new VPN functionality, 
not a bug |
   | **Component** | component:virtual-router, component:networking | Feature 
targets the Virtual Router and its VPN/networking capabilities |
   | **Severity** | n/a | Feature request, not a bug |
   | **Labels** | type:new-feature, component:virtual-router, 
component:networking | Applied per above |
   | **Coding agent** | Not suitable | Large feature requiring 
architectural/API design decisions; a prior implementation attempt (PR #9977) 
stalled specifically on an open API design question, indicating this needs 
maintainer/community design discussion before implementation |
   
   ### ๐Ÿ”— Similar issues
   
   No duplicate or closely related open issues were found via search. The 
author references PR #9977 (closed, unmerged) as substantial prior art, and 
mentions issue #13512 (IPsec S2S authentication-by-ID limitation) as related 
motivation.
   
   <details><summary>๐Ÿ’ก Notes and suggestions</summary>
   
   - Prior art: PR #9977 "Add Wireguard VPN integration" (closed without merge) 
and the CCC 2024 talk "Integrating Wireguard into Cloudstack VR" (slides and 
video linked in the issue) contain a substantial design and partial 
implementation that could be revived.
   - The PR reportedly stalled on an open API design question, then rebase 
conflicts, then author availability โ€” not on feature rejection. A 
maintainer/community decision on the API design would be a good first step 
before any implementation work resumes.
   - Consider looping in `@Dav-11` (original PR author) and Marco Ziglioli (CCC 
talk presenter) if reviving this effort, since design context already exists.
   
   </details>
   
   
   
   > Generated by [Daily Issue 
Triage](https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/actions/runs/33194874587) ยท 
sonnet50 94.9K ยท 
[โ—ท](https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Aapache%2Fcloudstack+%22gh-aw-workflow-call-id%3A+apache%2Fcloudstack%2Fdaily-issue-triage%22&type=issues)
   >
   <details>
   <summary>Add this agentic workflows to your repo</summary>
   
   To install this agentic workflow, run
   
   ```
   gh aw add 
githubnext/agentics/workflows/daily-issue-triage.md@d7c1dc4b72b00607a67caaffdcc216cb64379cf9
   ```
   </details>
   
   
   <!-- gh-aw-agentic-workflow: Daily Issue Triage, engine: copilot, version: 
1.0.52, model: claude-sonnet-5, id: 33194874587, workflow_id: 
daily-issue-triage, run: 
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/actions/runs/33194874587 -->
   <!-- gh-aw-workflow-call-id: apache/cloudstack/daily-issue-triage -->


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to