andrijapanicsb commented on issue #3780: Enhancement: Allow creating atmost 1 
physical network with null tag
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/3780#issuecomment-572745727
 
 
   Thanks for the explanation @weizhouapache - this should be in the 
description of the PR in the first place :)
   
   I've repeated commands that @ravening used to create 2 physical networks and 
attempt (and succeeded) to create a Guest traffic type on a specific Physical 
network (in clean 4.5 and clean 4.13)
   
   On the other hand, with this clean (zero-tags-anywhere) setup (clean 4.5 or 
clean 4.13)  - I can see the following "warning" in the API (same one in the 
GUI)
   
   > (localcloud) SBCM5> > create  network 
networkofferingid=471039c4-d0f9-4105-a5d8-2e58551bf445 
zoneid=450c5085-8832-46af-a60f-109a25af293a name=yyy displaytext==yyy
   ** Error: (HTTP 431, error code 4350) More than one physical networks exist 
in zone id=1 and no tags are specified in order to make a choice**
   
   So all checks are in place to ensure that an operator configures things 
"correctly".
   
   Perhaps it's just me, but I don't see a value in the behaviour that this PR 
brings - it allows you to have at most 1 untagged physical network/offering 
combination - but why (what does it solve)?  All one needs to do is to tag both 
the physical network and the offering and be 100% clear on what is going to be 
created where (update tags in DB).
   
   As @DaanHoogland pointed out, the operator might have a valid case where he 
wants both (more than one) physical networks untagged.
    So, can we please have a global configuration setting - that would make 
more sense (defaulting to the old behaviour)?

----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


With regards,
Apache Git Services

Reply via email to