DaanHoogland commented on a change in pull request #3739: Add new command to 
update security group name
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/3739#discussion_r375940638
 
 

 ##########
 File path: 
api/src/main/java/org/apache/cloudstack/api/command/user/securitygroup/UpdateSecurityGroupCmd.java
 ##########
 @@ -0,0 +1,105 @@
+// Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+// or more contributor license agreements.  See the NOTICE file
+// distributed with this work for additional information
+// regarding copyright ownership.  The ASF licenses this file
+// to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the
+// "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance
+// with the License.  You may obtain a copy of the License at
+//
+//   http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+//
+// Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing,
+// software distributed under the License is distributed on an
+// "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY
+// KIND, either express or implied.  See the License for the
+// specific language governing permissions and limitations
+// under the License.
+package org.apache.cloudstack.api.command.user.securitygroup;
+
+import org.apache.log4j.Logger;
+
+import org.apache.cloudstack.acl.RoleType;
+import org.apache.cloudstack.acl.SecurityChecker.AccessType;
+import org.apache.cloudstack.api.ACL;
+import org.apache.cloudstack.api.APICommand;
+import org.apache.cloudstack.api.ApiConstants;
+import org.apache.cloudstack.api.ApiErrorCode;
+import org.apache.cloudstack.api.BaseCustomIdCmd;
+import org.apache.cloudstack.api.Parameter;
+import org.apache.cloudstack.api.ServerApiException;
+import org.apache.cloudstack.api.response.SecurityGroupResponse;
+
+import com.cloud.network.security.SecurityGroup;
+import com.cloud.user.Account;
+
+@APICommand(name = UpdateSecurityGroupCmd.APINAME, description = "Updates a 
security group", responseObject = SecurityGroupResponse.class, entityType = 
{SecurityGroup.class},
+        requestHasSensitiveInfo = false, responseHasSensitiveInfo = false,
+        since = "4.14.0.0",
+        authorized = {RoleType.Admin})
+public class UpdateSecurityGroupCmd extends BaseCustomIdCmd {
+    public static final String APINAME = "updateSecurityGroup";
+    public static final Logger s_logger = 
Logger.getLogger(UpdateSecurityGroupCmd.class.getName());
+    private static final String s_name = "updatesecuritygroupresponse";
+
+    /////////////////////////////////////////////////////
+    //////////////// API parameters /////////////////////
+    /////////////////////////////////////////////////////
+
+    @ACL(accessType = AccessType.OperateEntry)
+    @Parameter(name = ApiConstants.ID, type = CommandType.UUID, required=true, 
description="The ID of the security group.", 
entityType=SecurityGroupResponse.class)
+    private Long id;
+
+    @Parameter(name = ApiConstants.NAME, type = CommandType.STRING, 
description = "The new name of the security group.")
+    private String name;
+
+    /////////////////////////////////////////////////////
+    /////////////////// Accessors ///////////////////////
+    /////////////////////////////////////////////////////
+
+    public Long getId() {
+        return id;
+    }
+
+    public String getName() {
+        return name;
+    }
+
+    /////////////////////////////////////////////////////
+    /////////////// API Implementation///////////////////
+    /////////////////////////////////////////////////////
+
+    @Override
+    public String getCommandName() {
+        return s_name;
+    }
+
+    @Override
+    public long getEntityOwnerId() {
+        SecurityGroup securityGroup = _entityMgr.findById(SecurityGroup.class, 
getId());
+        if (securityGroup != null) {
+            return securityGroup.getAccountId();
+        }
+
+        return Account.ACCOUNT_ID_SYSTEM; // no account info given, parent 
this command to SYSTEM so ERROR events are tracked
 
 Review comment:
   isn't this an exceptional situation? wouldn't there always be at least root 
admin responsible for creating a sec-group?

----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


With regards,
Apache Git Services

Reply via email to