This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.

garydgregory pushed a commit to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/commons-secure-xml.git

commit b56d718bdc8000effa5d1b0f5e7297c5a41984a8
Author: Gary Gregory <[email protected]>
AuthorDate: Mon Sep 14 17:16:15 2026 -0700

    Site documentation.
---
 README.md         | 4 ++--
 RELEASE-NOTES.txt | 4 ++--
 SECURITY.md       | 2 +-
 3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/README.md b/README.md
index 3536f0a..3d1bcb5 100644
--- a/README.md
+++ b/README.md
@@ -85,11 +85,11 @@ From a command shell, run `mvn` without arguments to invoke 
the default Maven go
 Contributing
 ------------
 
-We accept Pull Requests via GitHub. The [developer mailing 
list](https://commons.apache.org/mail-lists.html) is the main channel of 
communication for contributors.
+We accept pull requests via GitHub. The [developer mailing 
list](https://commons.apache.org/mail-lists.html) is the main channel of 
communication for contributors.
 There are some guidelines which will make applying PRs easier for us:
 + No tabs! Please use spaces for indentation.
 + Respect the existing code style for each file.
-+ Create minimal diffs - disable on save actions like reformat source code or 
organize imports. If you feel the source code should be reformatted create a 
separate PR for this change.
++ Create minimal diffs: disable on-save actions like reformatting source code 
or organizing imports. If you feel the source code should be reformatted, 
create a separate PR for this change.
 + Provide JUnit tests for your changes and make sure your changes don't break 
any existing tests by running `mvn`.
 + Before you push a PR, run `mvn` (without arguments). This runs the default 
goal which contains all build checks.
 + To see the code coverage report, regardless of coverage failures, run `mvn 
clean site -Dcommons.jacoco.haltOnFailure=false -Pjacoco`
diff --git a/RELEASE-NOTES.txt b/RELEASE-NOTES.txt
index 791ee22..e930fb0 100644
--- a/RELEASE-NOTES.txt
+++ b/RELEASE-NOTES.txt
@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ Apache Commons Secure XML provides secure-by-default JAXP 
factory creation, abst
 implementation-specific XXE securing differences between the stock JDK and 
external JAXP implementations
 (Android, Apache Xalan, Apache Xerces, Woodstox, Saxon-HE).
 
-First release, requires Java 8 or above.
+First release. Requires Java 8 or later.
 
 
 New features
@@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ Fixed Bugs
 
 * COMMONSXML-10:   Block XInclude (xi:include) href resolution by default, 
since the JAXP external-access properties do not govern it. Thanks to Ta Duc 
Thien, Piotr P. Karwasz, Gary Gregory.
 *                  Honor jdk.xml.overrideDefaultParser on TrAX, XPath and 
schema factories that recognize it. Thanks to Piotr P. Karwasz, Gary Gregory.
-*                  Restore the secure configuration when a factory or parser 
is reset() instead of reverting to the implementation defaults. Thanks to Piotr 
P. Karwasz, Gary Gregory.
+*                  Restore the secure configuration when reset() is called on 
a factory or parser instead of reverting to the implementation defaults. Thanks 
to Piotr P. Karwasz, Gary Gregory.
 *                  Parse a Source opted in by a caller-supplied URIResolver 
using a secure parser. Thanks to Piotr P. Karwasz, Gary Gregory.
 *                  Secure the document parse behind the InputSource-taking 
XPath evaluation entry points. Thanks to Piotr P. Karwasz, Gary Gregory.
 *                  Fall back to the standard factory lookup in the DOM, SAX 
and schema newDefaultInstance methods on Android. Thanks to Piotr P. Karwasz, 
Gary Gregory.
diff --git a/SECURITY.md b/SECURITY.md
index 370dcf0..ab15842 100644
--- a/SECURITY.md
+++ b/SECURITY.md
@@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ The workflows in this repository rest on the following trust 
assumptions:
   under the same governance and access controls as this repository.
 - **The risk of trusting `actions/*` and `github/*` is judged acceptable.**
   These are owned by GitHub,
-  the organisation that already runs the workflows and holds our secrets,
+  the organization that already runs the workflows and holds our secrets,
   so trusting its actions adds no party that could not compromise the 
workflows anyway.
 
 A workflow reference into any of these, by branch or tag instead of a pinned 
commit,

Reply via email to