This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
ggregory pushed a commit to branch master
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/commons-lang.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/master by this push:
new fe42d6b08 Fix typos
fe42d6b08 is described below
commit fe42d6b087f596717b7e7c9b1f17055b73c3b73a
Author: Gary Gregory <[email protected]>
AuthorDate: Sun Jan 15 08:13:46 2023 -0500
Fix typos
---
src/changes/changes.xml | 2 +-
src/main/java/org/apache/commons/lang3/concurrent/package-info.java | 2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/changes/changes.xml b/src/changes/changes.xml
index 803e8fd4b..4662f6384 100644
--- a/src/changes/changes.xml
+++ b/src/changes/changes.xml
@@ -722,7 +722,7 @@ The <action> type attribute can be add,update,fix,remove.
<action issue="LANG-978" type="fix" dev="sebb">Failing tests with Java 8
b128</action>
</release>
- <release version="3.3" date="2014-03-04" description="Bug fixes and and new
features including: DifferenceBuilder, ClassPathUtils, RandomUtils and
Jaro-Winkler String distance metric">
+ <release version="3.3" date="2014-03-04" description="Bug fixes and new
features including: DifferenceBuilder, ClassPathUtils, RandomUtils and
Jaro-Winkler String distance metric">
<action issue="LANG-621" type="fix" dev="kinow" due-to="Philip Hodges,
Thomas Neidhart">ReflectionToStringBuilder.toString does not debug 3rd party
object fields within 3rd party object</action>
<action issue="LANG-955" type="add" dev="britter" due-to="Adam Hooper">Add
methods for removing all invalid characters according to XML 1.0 and XML 1.1 in
an input string to StringEscapeUtils</action>
<action issue="LANG-977" type="fix" dev="britter" due-to="Chris
Karcher">NumericEntityEscaper incorrectly encodes supplementary
characters</action>
diff --git
a/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/lang3/concurrent/package-info.java
b/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/lang3/concurrent/package-info.java
index a283a86d0..08d97f6d2 100644
--- a/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/lang3/concurrent/package-info.java
+++ b/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/lang3/concurrent/package-info.java
@@ -138,7 +138,7 @@
* </p>
*
* <p>
- * Now, which one of the lazy initializer implementations should you use?
First of all we have to state that is is
+ * Now, which one of the lazy initializer implementations should you use?
First of all we have to state that is
* problematic to give general recommendations regarding the performance of
these classes. The initializers make use of
* low-level functionality whose efficiency depends on multiple factors
including the target platform and the number of
* concurrent threads. So developers should make their own benchmarks in
scenarios close to their specific use cases.
