Author: uli
Date: Mon Apr 11 09:49:53 2011
New Revision: 788205

Log:
Make GSoC 2011 instructions live.

Modified:
    websites/production/community/   (props changed)
    websites/production/community/content/mentee-ranking-process.html

Propchange: websites/production/community/
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--- svn:mergeinfo (original)
+++ svn:mergeinfo Mon Apr 11 09:49:53 2011
@@ -1,2 +1,2 @@
 /websites/staging/comdev/trunk:779592-779702
-/websites/staging/community/trunk:779703-787264
+/websites/staging/community/trunk:779703-788204

Modified: websites/production/community/content/mentee-ranking-process.html
==============================================================================
--- websites/production/community/content/mentee-ranking-process.html (original)
+++ websites/production/community/content/mentee-ranking-process.html Mon Apr 
11 09:49:53 2011
@@ -116,26 +116,25 @@ of Code application.</p>
 <p><a name="MenteeRankingProcess-ScoringSystem"></a></p>
 <h1 id="scoring_system">Scoring System</h1>
 <p>Projects are ranked using a scoring system as follows:</p>
-<p><em>Pre-Selection Phase</em> : done by mentor when accepting to be mentor 
of a
-given proposal</p>
+<h2 
id="pre-selection_phase__done_by_mentor_when_accepting_to_be_mentor_of_a_given_proposal"><em>Pre-Selection
 Phase</em> : done by mentor when accepting to be mentor of a given 
proposal</h2>
 <ul>
 <li>if the proposal is for a project you will be mentoring and you feel the
 proposal looks good enough for you to commit your time to it then click the
-"I am willing to Mentor" button. You should also add a "+4" score the
-project (see below).</li>
+"I am willing to Mentor" button and add the proposal URL, title and your 
Melange link_id to
+<a 
href="https://svn.apache.org/repos/private/committers/gsoc/GSoC-2011-scoring.csv";>https://svn.apache.org/repos/private/committers/gsoc/GSoC-2011-scoring.csv</a>.</li>
 </ul>
 <p>Please only offer to mentor a single project unless discussed on
-code-awards@a.o first.</p>
+code-awards@a.o first. Please also make sure that each proposal has
+exactly one mentor willing to mentor the proposal. If multiple community
+members wish to mentor a proposal please agree on only one who will be the
+"official" mentor.</p>
 <p>Other community members are free to comment on proposals as they see fit.
-However, unless you intend to mentor a project please do not add a score to
-the proposal. In the re-evaluation phase (see below) admins will use
+In the re-evaluation phase (see below) admins will use
 comments provided by mentors and community members.</p>
-<p>At the end of the pre-selection phase proposals should have a score of +4
-or zero. Thus admins can quickly scan the pre-selected projects for errors
-and correct them with adjustment scores.</p>
-<p><em>Selection Phase</em> : done by mentor during ranking time</p>
-<p>In this phase mentors evaluate the proposal. Mentors are asked to add a
-comment for each score added using the criteria below, this helps admins in
+<h2 id="selection_phase__done_by_mentor_during_ranking_time"><em>Selection 
Phase</em> : done by mentor during ranking time</h2>
+<p>All scoring is done in the spreadsheet at <a 
href="https://svn.apache.org/repos/private/committers/gsoc/GSoC-2011-scoring.csv";>https://svn.apache.org/repos/private/committers/gsoc/GSoC-2011-scoring.csv</a>.
 DO NOT ADD SCORES IN MELANGE! Use integer number only!</p>
+<p>In this phase mentors evaluate the proposal. Mentors are asked to add an
+explanation for each score added using the criteria below, this helps admins in
 the later stages of evaluation.</p>
 <p><em>Please do not add scores outside these criteria</em></p>
 <p>Any questions can be addressed to the admins on code-awards@a.o</p>
@@ -160,15 +159,11 @@ could conflict with the project (holiday
 this commitment? (0-2 points)</li>
 <li>Did student respond quickly to mentor inquiries? (0-2 points)</li>
 </ul>
-<p><em>NOTE:</em> The GSoC application only allow scores from -4 to +4 for each
-comment, so mentors will have to enter one comment with appropriate score
-for each of the selection criteria above.</p>
-<p>Other community members are free to comment on proposals as they see fit.
-However, unless you intend to mentor a project please do not add a score to
-the proposal. In the re-evaluation phase (see below) admins will use
+<p>Other community members are free to comment on proposals inside Melange as 
they see fit.
+However, DO NOT ADD A SCORE TO THE PROPOSAL. In the re-evaluation phase (see 
below) admins will use
 comments provided by mentors and community members.</p>
 <p>At the end of the selection phase proposals to be considered for support
-will have a score of between +4 and +23, and should only have scores from
+will have a score of between 0 and +23, and should only have scores from
 the assigned mentor and admins (at this stage admin scores are only
 corrections). The admins will check in during the selection phase
 periodically to look for problems by scanning the scores (i.e. anything
@@ -179,7 +174,7 @@ a score at or above the project ranked 3
 phase). Before progressing to the next phase admins will read all proposals
 either above or near the minimum score and ensure that there are no errors
 in this phase of ranking.</p>
-<p><em>Re-Evaluation</em> : done by admins during or after selection phase</p>
+<h2 
id="re-evaluation__done_by_admins_during_or_after_selection_phase"><em>Re-Evaluation</em>
 : done by admins during or after selection phase</h2>
 <p>In this phase admins evaluate all proposals above the required score and
 others that are just below it. We check those just below the required score
 to ensure that the scores have been equally assigned across all proposals
@@ -194,6 +189,7 @@ community members to mark a proposal up 
 <li>Admin discretionary points (-10 to +10 points, only used to break
 "deadlocks" across cut-off point, see below)</li>
 </ul>
+<p>The admins will transfer the scores to melange.</p>
 <p>At the end of this phase there is a short window for the community to
 verify the admins work before the final selection is made.</p>
 <p><a name="MenteeRankingProcess-Whatarewelookingforinagoodproposal?"></a></p>


Reply via email to