On Tue, Oct 11, 2005 at 08:41:15PM +0200, Simon 'corecode' Schubert wrote:
> Fork needs to take a lwp because the new proc's only lwp will be a copy 
> of the current lwp.  When we split out lwp from proc we'll have a lwp0 
> anyways.

You can implement it either way -- full proc forking or just one lwp.
The latter is most likely faster though :-)

Joerg

Reply via email to