Simon 'corecode' Schubert wrote:
David Xu wrote:
1:1 Userland threading stage 2.9/4:
Push out p_thread a little bit more
will you make 1:1 threading working ? I just posted a patch to Jeffrey
and Matt, this change creates lots conflict with my patch. :-)
oh sorry, i didn't know you were also working on that. maybe we both
should utilize the mailing lists more :)
my plan was to slowly adjust the code to use lwps where appropriate, and
when that's done, add code for signal/fork/exec/exit. i'd like to have
1:1 working in the december release.
what are your plans? i'm happy to review patches!
cheers
simon
>
I just picked up an early patch. I have removed p_lwp and replaced
it with dynamically allocation, but it still can only support one
lwp per-proc, another change is that I use lwp_sigmask and some
signal code is now per-lwp based, for example sigprocmask().
I will send the patch to you in another mail.
David Xu
