Matthew Dillon wrote:
:Matthew Dillon wrote:
:> sys/<ARCH>/conf/<KERNEL> -> sys/config/<KERNEL>
:Wouldn't sys/arch/<ARCH>/conf/<KERNEL> be better? Otherwise, why here?
I considered it, but it isn't very user friendly to have to
have your config files spread out all over the place. The most
likely scenario for a DragonFly user is going to be a couple of
configs for a virtual kernel architectures, a few for IA32 (UP and
SMP), and ultimately a few for IA64. I think it makes a lot more
sense for those files to be in one place. Also, having to specify
the machine architecture in the config file AND put the config file
in a special architecture-specific place is kinda redundant.
I think you mean AMD64 over IA64, but do you intend to introduce GENERIC.IA32, GENERIC.x86-64, GENERIC.IA64, GENERIC.PowerPC64, GENERIC.POWER64 etc? Because you obviously can't use the same config file for multiple archs unless you intend to introduce some sort of conditionals in the config(8) syntax.
Cheers,
--
Thomas E. Spanjaard
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
