On 03/25/2012 01:26 PM, Francois Tigeot wrote: > commit 95287e9bb847c4984a79e98ca53044dffc14d0fa > Author: Francois Tigeot <[email protected]> > Date: Sun Mar 25 12:38:51 2012 +0200 > > VFS accounting: use an explicit TAILQ_FIRST/TAILQ_NEXT loop in > mountlist_exists() > > The previous TAILQ_FOREACH loop body was never executed
The previous TAILQ_FOREACH was using a different field name for the iteration. That's what your patch changed, the open-coding of TAILQ_FOREACH doesn't make a difference. HTH, Aggelos
