mbeckerle commented on issue #361: RuntimeData objects should not carry 
namespaces
URL: 
https://github.com/apache/incubator-daffodil/pull/361#issuecomment-615328650
 
 
   Unless we expect the release to be delayed extensively, we're better off not 
merging.
   
   If things drag out, then a temporary branch so work can go forward on a 
"alternate master" branch would be a way to go, but for now I'd say let's just 
defer merging a few days.
   ________________________________
   From: Steve Lawrence <[email protected]>
   Sent: Friday, April 17, 2020 10:03 AM
   To: apache/incubator-daffodil <[email protected]>
   Cc: Beckerle, Mike <[email protected]>; Comment 
<[email protected]>
   Subject: Re: [apache/incubator-daffodil] RuntimeData objects should not 
carry namespaces (#361)
   
   
   @stevedlawrence approved this pull request.
   
   +1 👍 Thanks for the contribution!
   
   Before we merge this, to other Daffodil devs, are there any thoughts on 
putting a moratorium on merging pull requests during a release vote?
   
   Say this was a large complex change and we merged it during a vote. Then say 
the vote failed and we needed to make a minor fix (e.g. update LICENSE) and 
create a new release candidate. The complex change isn't going to have as much 
testing, and could make the new release candidate less stable. In that case, I 
think it makes sense to hold off on merging the complex change until after the 
release is out so that it is slated for the following release.
   
   We could take it on a case by case basis (in this case, I think it would be 
fine to merge and include in a new release candidate if there happened to be 
one), but then we need to define what level of complexity is okay which isn't 
obvious. It might be easier to just define a rule that says no merging during 
release votes?
   
   Thoughts? This discussion might be more appropriate for the dev list, but I 
think this is the first PR where this has come up so thought I'd mention it 
here before we merge.
   
   —
   You are receiving this because you commented.
   Reply to this email directly, view it on 
GitHub<https://github.com/apache/incubator-daffodil/pull/361#pullrequestreview-395482133>,
 or 
unsubscribe<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AALUDA7MRCPIQPUZUQR7L4LRNBOTVANCNFSM4MKXP3UQ>.
   

----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


With regards,
Apache Git Services

Reply via email to