stevedlawrence commented on pull request #502: URL: https://github.com/apache/daffodil/pull/502#issuecomment-801168012
Saxon provides some detailed information here: https://www.saxonica.com/documentation/#!conditions, which mentions this: > If you produce a product that includes or requires Saxon-HE, please refer to it prominently as "The Saxon XSLT and XQuery Processor from Saxonica Limited", and include the URL of the home page, which is at http://www.saxonica.com/. As a courtesy, please take reasonable steps to ensure that your users know that they are running Saxon. So I'd say something like this included in the License section of the README is sufficient: > This product includes The Saxon XSLT and XQuery Processor from Saxonica Limited (http://www.saxonica.com/), which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License version 2.0. We might want to consider including something like that in the bin.NOTICE file as well just to be safe. I'm not sure if it's require or not, but seems like it would be. The above saxonica link also mentions what it calls "Category B" code, which is code Saxon includes that is not MPL but is compatible (e.g. BSD, MIT, Apache). We don't currently include the licenses of those (and I dont't think we've verified that they are compatiable with Apache, just taking Saxon's word for it). So we need track those down--Saxon mentinos a ``notices`` directory which I can't immediately find but that should have all the information we need to make sure they are all acceptable to ASF, and then we can update our bin.LICENSE/bin.NOTICE appropriately. ---------------------------------------------------------------- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
