John Interrante created DAFFODIL-2602:
-----------------------------------------

             Summary: Daffodil uses different versions of log4j-api and 
log4j-core
                 Key: DAFFODIL-2602
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DAFFODIL-2602
             Project: Daffodil
          Issue Type: Bug
          Components: Libraries
    Affects Versions: 3.2.0
            Reporter: John Interrante


Inspected daffodil 3.2.0 zip.  Libs have log4j-api-2.13.2 and 
log4j-core-2.14.1.  Checked why they aren't the same version.  Checked how we 
add these libs,

 
{noformat}
project/Dependencies.scala
33:    "org.apache.logging.log4j" %% "log4j-api-scala" % "12.0",
34:    "org.apache.logging.log4j" % "log4j-core" % "2.14.1" % "it,test",
48:    "org.apache.logging.log4j" % "log4j-core" % "2.14.1",{noformat}
 

We specify version for jars in project/Dependencies.scala.  Adding 
log4j-api-scala 12.0 also adds log4j-api 2.13.2 2.13.2 transitively but 
log4j-core 2.13.2 is a runtime dependency, meaning it isn't added 
[transitively|https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j-scala/blob/master/project/Dependencies.scala].

We added all these three lines to project/Dependencies.scala in PR #605 but we 
didn't add log4j-api for some reason even though log4j-scala's 
[README|https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j-scala] suggests adding both 
log4j-api and log4j-core to our dependencies.  We should add the same version 
of log4j-api for consistency, which will allow Scala Steward to bump both of 
them to even later versions (note log4j-api-scala 12.0 bases its API on 
log4j-api 2.13.2, but there should be no backward API incompatibilities in 
future log4j 2.x releases).  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)

Reply via email to